-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
fix(rivetkit): fix onError handler not working #3455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 11-09-chore_site_tweak_wording
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(rivetkit): fix onError handler not working #3455
Conversation
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits |
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes the Changes Overview
Code Quality ✅Strengths:
Potential Issues 🔍Minor:
Performance Considerations ✅No performance concerns. The change actually improves performance slightly by:
Security Concerns ✅No security issues identified. Error handling is properly configured on the router before being passed to this function. Test Coverage
|
0ff831e to
60aeb32
Compare
89cf636 to
5fa1ff1
Compare
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes a bug where the What ChangedBefore: The After: The function now accepts a single pre-configured Hono AnalysisPositive Aspects ✅
Potential Concerns
|
Code ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes an issue where the onError handler in the manager router was not being properly applied. The root cause was that crossPlatformServe was creating a new Hono instance instead of using the router that already had error handlers configured via router.onError(handleRouteError) at manager/router.ts:131. Positive Changes
Code Quality AssessmentOverall: Good - The changes are minimal, focused, and solve a specific problem. Strengths:
Concerns
Security ConsiderationsNo security concerns identified. The changes don't introduce new attack vectors. Performance ConsiderationsPositive Impact: By removing the creation of an unnecessary Hono instance, there's a minor performance improvement (one less object allocation). Suggestions for Follow-up
RecommendationApprove with minor suggestions - The core fix is solid and addresses a real bug. The suggestions above are nice-to-haves that can be addressed in follow-up PRs if needed. The most important one is adding test coverage to prevent regression. Review performed by Claude Code following CLAUDE.md conventions |
5fa1ff1 to
7a00c89
Compare
60aeb32 to
2ae9f22
Compare
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR fixes a bug where the Code Quality ✅Positive Changes:
Code Style:
Architecture ✅The fix correctly addresses the root cause:
Potential Issues & Suggestions
Security ✅No security concerns identified. The changes don't introduce any new attack vectors or security vulnerabilities. Performance ✅
Breaking Changes
|
PR Review: Fix onError Handler Not WorkingSummaryThis PR fixes a bug where the Code Quality: ✅ GoodPositive Changes:
Technical Details:
Potential Issues:
|

No description provided.