Skip to content

Conversation

@zakisk
Copy link
Owner

@zakisk zakisk commented Aug 19, 2025

πŸ“ Description of the Change

πŸ”— Linked GitHub Issue

Fixes #

πŸ‘¨πŸ»β€ Linked Jira

πŸš€ Type of Change

  • πŸ› Bug fix (fix:)
  • ✨ New feature (feat:)
  • πŸ’₯ Breaking change (feat!:, fix!:)
  • πŸ“š Documentation update (docs:)
  • βš™οΈ Chore (chore:)
  • πŸ’… Refactor (refactor:)
  • πŸ”§ Enhancement (enhance:)
  • πŸ“¦ Dependency update (deps:)

πŸ§ͺ Testing Strategy

  • Unit tests
  • Integration tests
  • End-to-end tests
  • Manual testing
  • Not Applicable

βœ… Submitter Checklist

  • πŸ“ My commit messages are clear, informative, and follow the project's How to write a git commit message guide. The Gitlint linter ensures in CI it's properly validated
  • ✨ I have ensured my commit message prefix (e.g., fix:, feat:) matches the "Type of Change" I selected above.
  • β™½ I have run make test and make lint locally to check for and fix any
    issues. For an efficient workflow, I have considered installing
    pre-commit and running pre-commit install to
    automate these checks.
  • πŸ“– I have added or updated documentation for any user-facing changes.
  • πŸ§ͺ I have added sufficient unit tests for my code changes.
  • 🎁 I have added end-to-end tests where feasible. See README for more details.
  • πŸ”Ž I have addressed any CI test flakiness or provided a clear reason to bypass it.
  • If adding a provider feature, I have filled in the following and updated the provider documentation:
    • GitHub App
    • GitHub Webhook
    • Gitea/Forgejo
    • GitLab
    • Bitbucket Cloud
    • Bitbucket Data Center

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zakisk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on improving code clarity and maintainability by adding a detailed comment to the Run function within the pipelineascode.go file. This comment explains the function's role as the main orchestration entrypoint for event processing, detailing its responsibilities from matching repository rules to managing concurrency and updating Tekton PipelineRuns. This change enhances the understanding of a critical function's behavior for future developers.

Highlights

  • Code Documentation: Added a comprehensive multi-line comment to the Run function in pkg/pipelineascode/pipelineascode.go, clarifying its purpose and operational flow as the main orchestration entrypoint for processing incoming events.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a comprehensive and accurate comment to the Run function in pkg/pipelineascode/pipelineascode.go. The new comment clearly explains the function's purpose and its main responsibilities, which significantly improves the code's readability and maintainability. The change is well-contained and achieves its goal effectively. I have no further suggestions. Great work!

@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the test-workflow-for-me branch from 3e80866 to 255bec1 Compare August 19, 2025 06:17
@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the main branch 3 times, most recently from f96c75a to 61ba239 Compare August 19, 2025 11:40
@zakisk zakisk force-pushed the test-workflow-for-me branch 2 times, most recently from df5aa05 to f4a9dd2 Compare September 2, 2025 10:37
Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Zaki Shaikh <zashaikh@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants