You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 14, 2020. It is now read-only.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/adr/adr_0001.adoc
+5-4Lines changed: 5 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -181,17 +181,18 @@ Analog to kubernetes webhooks: HTTP server receiving findings and returning resu
181
181
182
182
== Decision
183
183
184
-
Regarding the Question 1 it seems that both solution approaches are resulting in the same execution model. We decided to implement solution approach 1 and unify both concepts into a more general concept with the name _"hook concept"_. Therefore we exchange the existing name `persistenceProvider` for phase 3 in the execution model with a more general term `DataProcessing`:
184
+
Regarding question 1 it seems that both solution approaches are resulting in the same execution model. We decided to implement solution approach 1 and unify both concepts into a more general concept with the name _hook concept_. Therefore we exchange the existing name _PersistenceProvider_ for phase 3 in the execution model with a more general term _DataProcessing_:
185
185
186
+
// #30 I suggest the term "processing" instead of data processing/
Regarding the Question 2 we decided to implement the solution approach 1 with a job-based approach (no active service component needed).
194
-
The Phase 3 `DataProcessing` will be therefore split into to separate phases named `ReadAndWriteHooks (3.1)` and `ReadOnlyHooks (3.2)`
194
+
Regarding question 2 we decided to implement the solution approach 1 with a job-based approach (no active service component needed). Therefore the phase 3 _data processing_ will be split into two separate phases named _ReadAndWriteHooks_ (3.1) and _ReadOnlyHooks_ (3.2)
0 commit comments