-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Improve ExecutorService lifecycle handling by moving shutdown to finally block #3166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Improve ExecutorService lifecycle handling by moving shutdown to finally block #3166
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @inv-jishnu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly identifies the need to ensure the ExecutorService is always shut down and moves the shutdown logic to a finally block. This is a good improvement for resource safety. However, the change in its current form introduces a critical race condition by calling processFooter before awaitTermination. This could lead to corrupted output, especially for JSON files. I have left comments with suggestions to correct the order of operations, ensuring the footer is written only after all export tasks have completed.
| logger.error("Timeout occurred while waiting for tasks to complete"); | ||
| // TODO: handle this | ||
| } | ||
| processFooter(exportOptions, tableMetadata, bufferedWriter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This call to processFooter introduces a race condition. It's now executed before the tasks in the ExecutorService are guaranteed to be complete. For formats like JSON, this can lead to a corrupted output file (e.g., a closing ] written before all objects). This line should be removed. The call should be moved into the finally block after awaitTermination succeeds, as I've suggested in another comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have made changes based on feedback in e84bc49.
| try { | ||
| if (executorService.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)) { | ||
| logger.info("All tasks completed"); | ||
| } else { | ||
| logger.error("Timeout occurred while waiting for tasks to complete"); | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (InterruptedException e) { | ||
| Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); | ||
| logger.error("Interrupted while waiting for executor termination", e); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As mentioned in my other comment, processFooter should be called here, after awaitTermination has successfully completed. This ensures all data has been written before the footer is added. The suggestion below moves the call here and also adds the necessary handling for IOException, which processFooter can throw.
try {
if (executorService.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)) {
logger.info("All tasks completed");
processFooter(exportOptions, tableMetadata, bufferedWriter);
} else {
logger.error("Timeout occurred while waiting for tasks to complete");
}
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
logger.error("Interrupted while waiting for executor termination", e);
} catch (IOException e) {
logger.error("Error writing footer: ", e);
}There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have made changes based on feedback in e84bc49.
Description
This PR updates the startExport method to ensure proper and reliable shutdown of the ExecutorService used during data export. I have created this PR based on @komamitsu san's comment #3146 (comment) from another PR.
Previously, the executor was shut down only after the export loop completed successfully. If an exception occurred before reaching that point, the executor would never be shut down, potentially causing thread leaks and keeping the JVM alive longer than intended.
The updated implementation moves the executor shutdown and termination logic into a finally block, ensuring that the executor is shut down in all scenarios.
This fix improves resource safety, prevents thread leaks, and aligns the code with best practices for managing thread pools.
Related issues and/or PRs
NA
Changes made
Checklist
Additional notes (optional)
NA
Release notes
Improve ExecutorService lifecycle handling by moving shutdown to finally block