Rollup of 8 pull requests #148778
Closed
Rollup of 8 pull requests #148778
+2,223
−564
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It belongs here, because it moves from a `rustc_*` type to a `rustdoc_json_types` type.
This step consists of two changes: - Renaming `self` to `props` - Inserting temporary comments to preserve line breaks This will make it easier to verify that the main migration commit preserves all of the lines being migrated.
Use `git diff --color-moved --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space` (or similar) to verify that the directive-processing lines have been moved without changes.
More robust stack protector testing I've added some tests related to the stack protector. These tests were originally in the LLVM stack protector test project. These tests were written for the "Stabilize stack-protector" proposal, and therefore removed the "stack-protector=basic" test option, as this stack protector was considered ineffective in Rust. For the proposal, see: rust-lang#146369 For the discussion, see zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Proposal.20for.20Adapt.20Stack.20Protector.20for.20Ru.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23841 r? ``@wesleywiser`` (feel free to reassign) cc ``@nikic,`` ``@rcvalle,`` ``@davidtwco,`` ``@arielb1,`` ``@Darksonn,`` ``@Noratrieb,`` ``@SparrowLii``
Rename `*exact_{div,shr,shl}` to `*{div,shr,shl}_exact`
Related to rust-lang#144336 and rust-lang#139911, see rust-lang#139911 (comment). I haven't touched the `exact_div`, `exact_udiv` and `exact_sdiv` intrinsics. Let me know if I should.
rustdoc-json: move `target` to `json::conversions` It belongs here, because it moves from a `rustc_*` type to a `rustdoc_json_types` type. r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
compiletest: Migrate `TestProps` directive handling to a system of named handlers One of the very silly things about directive processing in compiletest is that for each directive in the test file, we proceed to check it against dozens of different directive names in linear sequence, without any kind of indexed lookup, and without any early-exit after a known directive name is found (unless a panic occurs). This PR is a big step away from that, by taking the `iter_directives` loop in `TestProps::load_from` and making all of its directive processing dispatch to a hashtable of individual name-specific handlers instead. --- The handler system is set up in a way that should allow us to add capabilities or change the implementation as needed, without having to mass-modify the existing handlers (e.g. this is why the `handler` and `multi_handler` functions are used). --- This PR is focused on mass-migrating all of the `TestProps` directive processing into handlers. Most of the resulting handlers could obviously be simplified further (e.g. by avoiding the redundant name checks that were needed in the pre-migration code), but I've avoided doing any such simplifications in this PR to keep its scope limited and make reviewing easier. The patches in this PR have been arranged so that the main migration can be inspected with `git diff --color-moved --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space` to verify that it moves all of the relevant lines intact, without modifying or discarding any of them. r? jieyouxu
a few small clippy fixes
rustc_target: hide TargetOptions::vendor Discussed in rust-lang#148531 (comment). r? ``@bjorn3``
…=BoxyUwU IAT: Reinstate early bailout Apparently, some people are already using IATs in their projects and get blocked by rust-lang#142006 (comment) (cc dupes rust-lang#143952 & rust-lang#148535). Since the (temporary) fix is so trivial, let's just do it. Addresses rust-lang#142006 (comment). cc ``@luissantosHCIT`` (rust-lang#148535). r? ``@BoxyUwU``
Fix a typo in the documentation for the strict_shr function fix: rust-lang#148761
rustbot
added
A-compiletest
rustbot
added
T-bootstrap
Member
Author
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Member
Author
|
A bunch of other stuff was approved while the tree was closed, making this rollup too stale. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
*exact_{div,shr,shl}to*{div,shr,shl}_exact#147771 (Rename*exact_{div,shr,shl}to*{div,shr,shl}_exact)targettojson::conversions#147833 (rustdoc-json: movetargettojson::conversions)TestPropsdirective handling to a system of named handlers #147955 (compiletest: MigrateTestPropsdirective handling to a system of named handlers)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup