chore(core): migrate client protocol to BARE #1203
Conversation
|
Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job PR Review: chore(core): migrate to BAREThis is a comprehensive migration adding BARE (Binary Application Record Encoding) as a third serialization option alongside JSON and CBOR. The implementation appears well-structured with proper versioning support. ✅ Code Quality & ArchitectureStrengths:
Areas for Improvement:
🐛 Potential Issues
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsPositive:
Concerns:
🔒 Security AssessmentGood Practices:
Recommendations:
📊 Test CoverageExcellent:
Missing:
🔄 Breaking ChangesThis appears to be backward compatible - existing JSON/CBOR clients should continue working. The 📝 Recommendations
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed migration that maintains backward compatibility while adding a modern binary serialization format. The versioning system is particularly well-designed for future evolution. Primary concerns are the import resolution issue and missing integration tests. Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor fixes - Address the import issue and consider adding integration tests before merging. |
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
NathanFlurry
force-pushed
the
09-10-chore_core_migrate_to_bare
branch
from
1c03328 to
c3e37e2
Compare
NathanFlurry
changed the title
|
Claude finished @NathanFlurry's task —— View job PR Review: BARE Protocol MigrationThis is a comprehensive migration adding BARE (Binary Application Record Encoding) as a third serialization option alongside JSON and CBOR. The implementation demonstrates good architectural planning with proper versioning support. Review Tasks
✅ Code Quality & ArchitectureStrengths:
🐛 Critical Issues1. Import Resolution Problem ( import * as v1 from "../../../dist/schemas/client-protocol/v1";
2. Inconsistent HTTP_RESOLVE_REQUEST Handling ( serializeVersion: (_) => new Uint8Array(),
deserializeVersion: (bytes) => null,
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsPositive:
Potential Concerns:
🔒 Security AssessmentGood Practices:
Recommendations:
📊 Test Coverage AnalysisExcellent:
Missing:
🔄 Breaking Changes✅ Backward Compatible: This appears to be fully backward compatible. The 📝 Key RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority:
Low Priority:
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a well-architected migration that successfully adds BARE serialization while maintaining backward compatibility. The versioning system is particularly well-designed for future protocol evolution. Key Strengths:
Areas for Improvement:
Recommendation: ✅ Approve - This is a solid implementation that follows good patterns and maintains compatibility. Consider adding integration tests as a follow-up. |
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| // Schedule sleep to happen on the next tick. This allows for any action that calls _sleep to complete. | ||
| setImmediate(async () => { | ||
| // The actor driver should call stop when ready to stop | ||
| // | ||
| // This will call _stop once Pegboard responds with the new status | ||
| await sleep(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Async setup race condition: Using setImmediate() with an async callback creates a fire-and-forget async operation that could continue executing after the actor instance is disposed or in an inconsistent state. If _sleep() is called during actor shutdown or if the actor driver becomes unavailable between the setImmediate scheduling and execution, this could cause undefined behavior. The async operation should be properly awaited or the actor should track this pending operation for cleanup.
| // Schedule sleep to happen on the next tick. This allows for any action that calls _sleep to complete. | |
| setImmediate(async () => { | |
| // The actor driver should call stop when ready to stop | |
| // | |
| // This will call _stop once Pegboard responds with the new status | |
| await sleep(); | |
| }); | |
| // Return a promise that resolves when sleep is complete | |
| return new Promise<void>((resolve, reject) => { | |
| // Schedule sleep to happen on the next tick. This allows for any action that calls _sleep to complete. | |
| setImmediate(async () => { | |
| try { | |
| // The actor driver should call stop when ready to stop | |
| // | |
| // This will call _stop once Pegboard responds with the new status | |
| await sleep(); | |
| resolve(); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| reject(error); | |
| } | |
| }); | |
| }); |
Spotted by Diamond
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
| if ( | ||
| ws.readyState === 2 /* CLOSING */ || | ||
| ws.readyState === 3 /* CLOSED */ | ||
| ) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Logic error in WebSocket state check: The condition checks for readyState values 2 (CLOSING) and 3 (CLOSED) using hardcoded numbers, but WebSocket readyState constants should be used for clarity and correctness. More critically, if the WebSocket is in CLOSING state (2), the code assumes it's safe to skip cleanup, but CLOSING state means close() has been called but the connection isn't fully closed yet. The code should only skip cleanup for CLOSED state (3), and should still wait for the close event in CLOSING state to ensure proper cleanup.
| if ( | |
| ws.readyState === 2 /* CLOSING */ || | |
| ws.readyState === 3 /* CLOSED */ | |
| ) { | |
| if ( | |
| ws.readyState === WebSocket.CLOSED | |
| ) { |
Spotted by Diamond
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
Merge activity
|
Fixes KIT-247