-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Prevent cache load race condition #20205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sterliakov
wants to merge
4
commits into
python:master
Choose a base branch
from
sterliakov:bugfix/cache-race
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+33
−16
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a bad idea to do this while GC is (potentially) frozen. In general, I think we should not complicate logic in
build.pyfor some rare/niche use cases, it is already complicated and tricky enough. I think we should simply addtry/exceptwith an error message suggesting using different--cache-dirper invocation when runningmypyin parallel.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is already an exceptional case, we can only reach this branch if multiple processes are running concurrently. Note that this also fixes an (unreported) crash that is almost guaranteed to happen if the existing
data is Noneearly return branch is taken inState.load_tree(and I see how that can reasonably happen even without concurrency - network error on a mapped drive, for example, or just a disk fault).If I understand correctly, the worst possible outcome in this case is OOM (which is a very good way to say "please stop running multiple instances concurrently") or increased mem usage, so what do we risk by allowing this to happen?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not super happy about try/except because it may actually not happen even when the data is stale - it may be compatible by interface but not semantically, - resulting in inconsistent state somewhere and unpredictable heisenbugs no one can reproduce.
Or let's add a checkbox to the issue template asking if the OP is running some IDE integration without explicit
--cache-dirconfiguration...