Vpn management creation #562
Draft
+223
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DominatrixiaALLATU
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
Reference to Existing Issue
First Draft for implementing the server part of #201.
Only tested in molecule for now.
Description of Changes
openwisp2_openvpn_setupis set to trueA VPN server object is created by the load_initial_data.py script.
Its name and id are known by ansible only for this run, which makes it possible to download the configuration and start the openvpn server.
That is if there is no error...
If an error occurs somewhere after adding the VPN object in the DB, the name and id of the VPN will not be available on the following runs, which means the setup must be completed manually...
Not sure if this is acceptable and/or if there is a better way to address that problem (known unique vpn_server_name that we can look for on every run instead ?)
In any case, let me know what you think about this...