Skip to content

Conversation

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

GP3 volumes have the ability to configure throughput from 125 MiB/s to 1000 MiB/s. This allows the ability to set this at install time in the install-config.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-4212

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2025

@jhixson74: This pull request references CORS-4212 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

GP3 volumes have the ability to configure throughput from 125 MiB/s to 1000 MiB/s. This allows the ability to set this at install time in the install-config.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-4212

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Hello @jhixson74! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 17, 2025
@jhixson74
Copy link
Member Author

I see that the linter is failing. For the life of me, I don't know why since every other field in that struct also does not start with the name. Any pointers? ;-)

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Pre-existing fields do not meet conventions, please follow the linter so that new content does meet conventions.
All new fields should have godoc starting with the serialised version of the field name. throughput is...

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

Is this feature available in CAPA upstream?

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member Author

Is this feature available in CAPA upstream?

Yes.

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from 4a4d3cf to ee12153 Compare September 17, 2025 17:36
@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Sep 17, 2025

IIUC, the throughput setting is not yet supported in MAPI (thus this PR is created) right?

From OCPSTRAT-2410, it looks like we are not looking to add support MAPI, but rather wait for CAPI migration in OCPSTRAT-1992 (the throughput is already supported there). So, is this change still needed?

I might be misunderstanding something...

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch 2 times, most recently from ab99e54 to b7238bc Compare September 19, 2025 22:49
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to @tthvo's #2480 (comment)

I'm confused. IIUC this PR is adding configuration for MAPI; but MAPI-support is not part of the plan, this is a CAPI-only feature. I think we should just depend on the existing CAPI API and close this PR. @jhixson74 @JoelSpeed can you please clarify?

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

I'm confused. IIUC this PR is adding configuration for MAPI; but MAPI-support is not part of the plan, this is a CAPI-only feature. I think we should just depend on the existing CAPI API and close this PR. @jhixson74 @JoelSpeed can you please clarify?

We aren't clear yet when we will GA CAPI on OCP. We can avoid adding this to MAPI sure, but that currently restricts control plane usage (as control plane CAPI is further down the road), but it seems like a fairly minor effort to add it IMO and means that conversion between the two types of machine has fewer edge cases

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

I'm confused. IIUC this PR is adding configuration for MAPI; but MAPI-support is not part of the plan, this is a CAPI-only feature. I think we should just depend on the existing CAPI API and close this PR. @jhixson74 @JoelSpeed can you please clarify?

We aren't clear yet when we will GA CAPI on OCP. We can avoid adding this to MAPI sure, but that currently restricts control plane usage (as control plane CAPI is further down the road), but it seems like a fairly minor effort to add it IMO and means that conversion between the two types of machine has fewer edge cases

Agreed. Adding MAPI support seems like the right thing here.

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from b7238bc to 86385ff Compare September 25, 2025 04:21
@jhixson74 jhixson74 changed the title CORS-4212: AWS: Add the ability to configure throughput on GP3 volumes CORS-4250: AWS: Add the ability to configure throughput on GP3 volumes Sep 26, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 26, 2025

@jhixson74: This pull request references CORS-4250 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

GP3 volumes have the ability to configure throughput from 125 MiB/s to 1000 MiB/s. This allows the ability to set this at install time in the install-config.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-4212

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 26, 2025

@jhixson74: This pull request references CORS-4250 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

// it is not used in requests to create gp2, st1, sc1, or standard volumes.
// +optional
Iops *int64 `json:"iops,omitempty"`
// throughput to provision in MiB/s supported for the volume type. Not applicable to all types.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jhixson74 Are you sure you want to add this to v1beta1 and not v1?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no v1 for this API

// throughput to provision in MiB/s supported for the volume type. Not applicable to all types.
//
// This parameter is valid only for gp3 volumes.
// Valid Range: Minimum value of 125. Maximum value of 1000.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can it have any value between 125 and 1000?

//
// When omitted, this means no opinion, and the platform is left to
// choose a reasonable default, which is subject to change over time.
// The current default is 125.
Copy link
Contributor

@sadasu sadasu Oct 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there value in adding // +default=125? Can its value be modified in a running cluster?

Can we also add a link to the documentation that you have been using for reference?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We shouldn't add defaults for this API as it's a configuration API. We may want to adjust this default over time so it's better to have nothing persisted and allow this to be defaulted by the controller when acting up on the value

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 19, 2025
@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Nov 19, 2025

@jhixson74 One more lint fix for ci/prow/lint fail? 😅

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from ef60ce1 to c4802d6 Compare November 20, 2025 17:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 20, 2025
@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from c4802d6 to 3331ded Compare November 20, 2025 18:31
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
openapi/openapi.json (1)

23388-23392: Add OpenAPI validation constraints for throughputMib.

The throughputMib field specifies valid range (125–2000 MiB/s) in the description but does not enforce these bounds in the schema itself. Add minimum and maximum constraints to enable client-side validation.

         "throughputMib": {
           "description": "throughputMib to provision in MiB/s supported for the volume type. Not applicable to all types.\n\nThis parameter is valid only for gp3 volumes. Valid Range: Minimum value of 125. Maximum value of 2000.\n\nWhen omitted, this means no opinion, and the platform is left to choose a reasonable default, which is subject to change over time. The current default is 125.",
           "type": "integer",
-          "format": "int32"
+          "format": "int32",
+          "minimum": 125,
+          "maximum": 2000
         }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4802d6 and 3331ded.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go (2 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go (1 hunks)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (2 hunks)
  • openapi/openapi.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go
  • openapi/openapi.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go (1)

584-588: LGTM! Deepcopy logic for ThroughputMib is correct.

The deepcopy implementation correctly follows the established pattern for optional pointer fields (int32) and is consistent with other fields like Iops, VolumeSize, and VolumeType in the same function.

machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go (1)

111-113: LGTM! Swagger documentation is comprehensive and accurate.

The documentation correctly describes:

  • throughputMib: Valid for gp3 volumes, range 125-2000 MiB/s (reflecting AWS's latest limits), with clear default behavior
  • volumeType: Updated to include gp3 alongside other volume types

Both additions align with the PR objectives to support GP3 throughput configuration.

openapi/openapi.json (3)

14271-14340: Verify FormatMarkerExamples schema generation source.

The FormatMarkerExamples schema appears to be a manually-added documentation reference within openapi.json. Since this file is typically auto-generated, confirm that this addition is intentional and not a build artifact or merge conflict remnant. If this is generated code, verify the source type/code generated it.


14430-14433: Godoc format is correct.

The field description correctly starts with the serialized field name "formatMarkerExamples" and provides clear documentation of its purpose.


23399-23399: Fix volumeType field description to follow godoc conventions.

The description should start with the field name "volumeType" to comply with Go documentation standards. According to the PR discussion, this was flagged as a linting issue that must be addressed.

-          "description": "The volume type: gp3, gp2, io1, st1, sc1, or standard. Default: standard",
+          "description": "volumeType is the volume type: gp3, gp2, io1, st1, sc1, or standard. Default: standard",

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from 3331ded to 04158de Compare November 20, 2025 18:35
@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from 04158de to d1b602d Compare November 20, 2025 19:10
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04158de and d1b602d.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go (1 hunks)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (2 hunks)
  • openapi/openapi.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • openapi/openapi.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
openapi/openapi.json (1)

23388-23399: Verify throughputMib field description aligns with generated code in other files.

Ensure the throughputMib description in this OpenAPI schema matches the GoDoc string in machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go and the swagger documentation in zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go mentioned in the AI summary.

@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from d1b602d to e77874c Compare November 20, 2025 19:12
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
openapi/openapi.json (3)

14430-14433: Remove formatMarkerExamples property—dependent on out-of-scope schema.

This property reference depends on the FormatMarkerExamples schema (Hunk 1). Remove it when removing that schema to keep the PR focused.


14271-14340: FormatMarkerExamples schema remains out of scope—should be removed.

This schema addition (and its reference in Hunk 2) is unrelated to the PR's stated objective of adding GP3 throughput configuration. Past reviews flagged this as scope creep from a separate commit. Remove this schema definition to keep the PR focused on the ThroughputMib feature.


23388-23392: Add minimum/maximum constraints to throughputMib schema.

The throughputMib field description documents the valid range (125–2000), but the OpenAPI schema lacks explicit minimum and maximum properties. Add these constraints to self-document the allowed values and match the Go code's kubebuilder validation markers.

Apply this diff:

         "throughputMib": {
           "description": "throughputMib to provision in MiB/s supported for the volume type. Not applicable to all types.\n\nThis parameter is valid only for gp3 volumes. Valid Range: Minimum value of 125. Maximum value of 2000.\n\nWhen omitted, this means no opinion, and the platform is left to choose a reasonable default, which is subject to change over time. The current default is 125.",
           "type": "integer",
-          "format": "int32"
+          "format": "int32",
+          "minimum": 125,
+          "maximum": 2000
         }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1b602d and e77874c.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go (1 hunks)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (1 hunks)
  • openapi/openapi.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go
  • openapi/openapi.json

GP3 volumes have the ability to configure throughput from 125 MiB/s to
2000 MiB/s. This allows the ability to set this at install time in the
install-config.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CORS-4212
@jhixson74 jhixson74 force-pushed the master_aws_gp3_throughput branch from e77874c to 41ccbe5 Compare November 20, 2025 19:24
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
openapi/openapi.json (2)

14271-14340: FormatMarkerExamples schema remains unrelated to GP3 throughput—remove or defer to separate PR.

This new schema and its reference (hunks 1–2) were previously flagged as scope creep. Git analysis in the prior review showed this content originated from a separate commit (80d1f5c) and is unrelated to the stated PR objective (CORS-4250: configuring GP3 EBS throughput). If format marker documentation is needed, it belongs in a dedicated PR, not bundled with the GP3 feature.

Apply this diff to remove both hunks:

-    "com.github.openshift.api.example.v1.FormatMarkerExamples": {
-      "description": "FormatMarkerExamples demonstrates all Kubebuilder Format markers supported as of Kubernetes 1.33. This struct provides a comprehensive reference for format marker validation. Each field uses a different format marker to validate its value.",
-      "type": "object",
-      "properties": {
-        "base64Data": {
-          "description": "base64Data must be valid base64-encoded data. Valid examples include aGVsbG8= (encodes \"hello\") or SGVsbG8gV29ybGQh (encodes \"Hello World!\").",
-          "type": "string"
-        },
-        ... (all other format marker fields)
-      }
-    },

And in the StableConfigType properties:

-        "formatMarkerExamples": {
-          "description": "formatMarkerExamples demonstrates all Kubebuilder Format markers supported as of Kubernetes 1.33. This field serves as a comprehensive reference for format marker validation.",
-          "$ref": "#/definitions/com.github.openshift.api.example.v1.FormatMarkerExamples"
-        },

Also applies to: 14430-14433


23388-23392: Add OpenAPI validation constraints for throughputMib to match Kubebuilder markers.

The throughputMib field description documents the valid range (125–2000), but the OpenAPI schema lacks explicit minimum and maximum numeric constraints. The Go type definition in machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go includes:

// +kubebuilder:validation:Minimum:=125
// +kubebuilder:validation:Maximum:=2000

These constraints must be reflected in the OpenAPI schema for consistency and proper API documentation.

Apply this diff to add validation constraints:

         "throughputMib": {
           "description": "throughputMib to provision in MiB/s supported for the volume type. Not applicable to all types.\n\nThis parameter is valid only for gp3 volumes. Valid Range: Minimum value of 125. Maximum value of 2000.\n\nWhen omitted, this means no opinion, and the platform is left to choose a reasonable default, which is subject to change over time. The current default is 125.",
           "type": "integer",
-          "format": "int32"
+          "format": "int32",
+          "minimum": 125,
+          "maximum": 2000
         }

If this file is auto-generated, ensure the OpenAPI generation process is re-run to regenerate the schema with these constraints included.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (1)

40570-40576: LGTM! Generated OpenAPI schema correctly represents the throughputMib field.

The schema accurately documents the gp3-only constraint and the valid range (125-2000 MiB/s), which aligns with the updated AWS limits.

Optional enhancement: The OpenAPI schema could include explicit minimum: 125 and maximum: 2000 constraints on the throughputMib field for schema-level validation and improved API documentation. However, since webhook validation handles runtime checks and this approach is consistent with other fields (e.g., volumeSize documents constraints without schema enforcement), the current implementation is acceptable. If desired, this would need to be added in the source type definitions, not in this generated file.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e77874c and 41ccbe5.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go (2 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go (1 hunks)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go (1 hunks)
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (2 hunks)
  • openapi/openapi.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go
  • machine/v1beta1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go
  • openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go
  • openapi/openapi.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
machine/v1beta1/types_awsprovider.go (2)

216-228: LGTM!

The ThroughputMib field implementation is well-structured and thoroughly documented. The field correctly uses *int32 for optional semantics, includes appropriate validation markers (125-2000 MiB/s), clearly states it applies only to gp3 volumes, and documents the default behavior. The implementation follows established API conventions and addresses all past review feedback.


241-241: LGTM!

Good documentation improvement. Explicitly listing gp3 alongside other supported volume types improves API clarity and aligns with the addition of the gp3-specific ThroughputMib field.

openapi/generated_openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go (1)

40586-40586: LGTM! volumeType description correctly updated to include gp3.

The explicit listing of gp3 as a valid volume type improves documentation clarity and aligns with the PR objectives.

@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Nov 20, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 20, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2025

@jhixson74: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@tthvo tthvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Nothing changed since other than making lint happy :D

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven, patrickdillon, sadasu, tthvo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Nov 20, 2025

/verified by @tthvo

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 20, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@tthvo: This PR has been marked as verified by @tthvo.

In response to this:

/verified by @tthvo

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit cb382c9 into openshift:master Nov 20, 2025
15 checks passed
@liweinan
Copy link

Thanks for merging this PR! I'll wait for a nightly build and then do the test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants