Skip to content

Conversation

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

@JornVernee JornVernee commented Nov 7, 2025

The existing test uses the JVMTI VMStart callback to look up a class. This works when using CDS, because the class is already available, but because VMStart is called while the VM is still being initialized, it fails to find the target class when CDS is turned off.

Instead, the VMInit callback should be used, which runs after the VM has been initialized. This patch does this. Additionally, it delays the call to allocate OTHER_SEGMENT. If we call FindClass during VMInit, the <clinit> of the class will run, which then ends up calling checkValidStateRaw as a result of allocating OTHER_SEGMENT, and we get to our method exit event code before the target class and method ID have been initialized.

As a side note: I had know about the difference between VMInit and VMStart, and had actually intended to use VMInit in the first place, but I seem to have gotten the two confused, because they are listed in reverse chronological order in the list under 'Set Event Notification Mode' in the JVMTI spec (https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/25/docs/specs/jvmti.html#SetEventNotificationMode).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8371474: Wrong object class or methodID passed to JNI call in TestSharedCloseJvmti with -Xshare:off (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28202/head:pull/28202
$ git checkout pull/28202

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28202
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28202/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28202

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28202

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28202.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 7, 2025

👋 Welcome back jvernee! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@JornVernee This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371474: Wrong object class or methodID passed to JNI call in TestSharedCloseJvmti with -Xshare:off

Reviewed-by: alanb, mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 7, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@JornVernee The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@JornVernee JornVernee marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2025 01:14
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, using VMInit so the code executes when the VM is fully initialized is right.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and fixes the issue. Thanks!

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM and fixes the issue. Thanks!

Thanks for the initial investigation!

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Going to push as commit 6e838d6.
Since your change was applied there have been 27 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 10, 2025

@JornVernee Pushed as commit 6e838d6.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@JornVernee JornVernee deleted the SharedCloseJvmtiCDS branch November 10, 2025 15:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants