-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Improve ATM extensibility by replacing fixed properties with a dynamic list #131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
+10
−30
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -57,24 +57,14 @@ final class MoneyPile: Withdrawing { | |
|
|
||
| final class ATM: Withdrawing { | ||
|
|
||
| private var hundred: Withdrawing | ||
| private var fifty: Withdrawing | ||
| private var twenty: Withdrawing | ||
| private var ten: Withdrawing | ||
| private var moneyPiles: [Withdrawing] | ||
|
|
||
| private var startPile: Withdrawing { | ||
| return self.hundred | ||
| return self.moneyPiles.first! | ||
|
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Another force unwrap. Backwards compatibility is not worth it imho |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| init(hundred: Withdrawing, | ||
| fifty: Withdrawing, | ||
| twenty: Withdrawing, | ||
| ten: Withdrawing) { | ||
|
|
||
| self.hundred = hundred | ||
| self.fifty = fifty | ||
| self.twenty = twenty | ||
| self.ten = ten | ||
| init(moneyPiles: [Withdrawing]) { | ||
| self.moneyPiles = moneyPiles | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func withdraw(amount: Int) -> Bool { | ||
|
|
@@ -91,6 +81,6 @@ let fifty = MoneyPile(value: 50, quantity: 2, next: twenty) | |
| let hundred = MoneyPile(value: 100, quantity: 1, next: fifty) | ||
|
|
||
| // Build ATM. | ||
| var atm = ATM(hundred: hundred, fifty: fifty, twenty: twenty, ten: ten) | ||
| var atm = ATM(moneyPiles: [hundred, fifty, twenty, ten]) | ||
| atm.withdraw(amount: 310) // Cannot because ATM has only 300 | ||
| atm.withdraw(amount: 100) // Can withdraw - 1x100 | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I appreciate your contribution. Force unwrap is not allowed, we are trying to teach folks good architecture, small infractions like that may give wrong impression that such code is acceptable, it's not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the feedback. 😊
since this is educational code, maintaining type safety is more important than adding flexibility with an array.
I see now that the original version is more appropriate for this case.
Thanks for taking the time to review.
I'll close this PR.