feat: Enhance README with product pitch and ELI5 technical explanation #8
Conversation
- Add compelling product value proposition (4 key benefits) - Include 5 real-world use cases across different industries - Add ELI5 section explaining how Mark 1 works - Add 'Why Choose Mark 1' comparison table with time savings - Improve marketing appeal while maintaining technical accuracy - Add link to Architecture documentation for deeper learning Closes #7
WalkthroughREADME.md was extensively revised with expanded marketing content, new explanatory sections, and reorganized headings. Changes include enhanced hero description emphasizing no-code Robot Framework test generation, new sections like "What Can Mark 1 Do For You?", "Real-World Use Cases", and "Troubleshooting", and a simplified "How It Works" walkthrough. No code changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Devasy23
added
documentation
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
11-11: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
70-70: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
78-78: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
86-86: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
94-94: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
102-102: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
184-184: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
README.md (8)
123-159: Add Windows PowerShell quick start snippet alongside Unix/bash instructions.The PR objectives explicitly require "at least one verified command set for Windows PowerShell and one for Unix-like shells." Currently only Unix
bashcommands are shown (lines 134–145). Add a Windows PowerShell equivalent or toggle section so Windows users have copy-paste-ready instructions.Consider adding a "Windows (PowerShell)" subsection after the Unix instructions. Example structure:
### Installation (Windows PowerShell) \`\`\`powershell # 1. Clone the repository git clone https://github.com/your-repo/mark-1.git cd mark-1 # 2. Configure your API key Copy-Item src/backend/.env.example src/backend/.env # Edit src/backend/.env and add your GEMINI_API_KEY # 3. Start Mark 1 .\run.sh # 4. Start BrowserUse service (in another terminal) python tools/browser_use_service.py \`\`\`Please verify the correct PowerShell commands for your environment (e.g., whether
run.shworks on Windows or needs a.batequivalent, or if WSL is required).
49-49: Verify the "95%+ Success Rate" claim with supporting evidence.Line 49 states "95%+ Success Rate - Vision-based element detection that actually works." This is a quantified claim that could attract users. Ensure this metric is:
- Measured consistently (across which test scenarios/websites?)
- Documented in a design doc or internal metrics (so you can defend it if challenged)
- Realistic and reproducible
If this is aspirational or under-tested, soften the language to avoid overpromising.
214-214: Clarify scope of "computer vision" element detection.Line 214 specifies "(using computer vision)" for element detection. Confirm whether this:
- Uses OCR or visual/image-based detection (screenshot analysis)?
- Falls back to traditional selectors if computer vision fails?
- Works for all element types (text, buttons, inputs, modals, etc.)?
A brief inline clarification (e.g., "AI-powered computer vision and DOM introspection") would set user expectations more clearly.
143-149: Verify run.sh and BrowserUse service startup instructions for correctness.Lines 144–149 reference
./run.shandpython tools/browser_use_service.pywith specific port assumptions (port 5000 for app, port 4999 for BrowserUse service per line 299). Ensure:
run.shexists and is executable in the repo root- The script correctly sets up the backend environment and handles
.envloading- Port 4999 is the correct default for BrowserUse service (or is it configurable?)
- The second terminal step is required (or can both run in one command/tmux?)
Also, the guide doesn't mention whether Docker containers start automatically via
run.shor if users must manually launch them.
227-241: Confirm project structure accuracy and add directory purpose descriptions.The structure diagram (lines 227–241) describes key directories (
src/backend/,tools/,robot_tests/,docs/). Verify:
- Are these the actual current directory names in the repo?
- Does
robot_tests/auto-populate as described, or is it a template?- Are there other important directories (config/, tests/, examples/) not mentioned?
Consider expanding brief inline descriptions (e.g., "src/backend/ — FastAPI REST API with multi-agent AI orchestration").
1-9: Strong hero message and value proposition — well-positioned for the target audience.The opening hero description (line 9) effectively conveys the core promise ("plain English → production-ready tests") and the key benefit ("Write once, execute infinitely"). The diagram (lines 11–17) and follow-up sections create a compelling narrative arc that combines marketing appeal with technical credibility.
19-44: Well-structured value proposition with clear audience segmentation.The four-pillar benefits ("One-Stop Solution," "Write Once Execute Infinitely," "Gets Smarter Over Time," "Perfect for Manual QA Teams") effectively address different stakeholder concerns (ease-of-use, reusability, learning, accessibility). Phrasing is clear and benefit-driven.
56-65: Comparison tables and use-case narratives add strong marketing value.The three tables/matrices (Quick Comparison, Real-World Use Cases, Why Choose Mark 1?) and specific industry scenarios provide concrete context and quantified benefits (e.g., "40-60% faster test creation," "3-5x faster than Selenium IDE"). This approach helps prospects self-identify fit and ROI.
Also applies to: 66-107, 110-120
| **Transform plain English into production-ready test automation.** Mark 1 is an intelligent test generation platform that converts natural language descriptions into executable Robot Framework code using a sophisticated multi-agent AI system. No coding required—just describe what you want to test. | ||
| **Transform plain English into production-ready test automation.** Mark 1 is your one-stop solution for writing automation tests without coding. Just describe what you want to test in plain English, and watch it generate working Robot Framework tests automatically. Write once, execute infinitely—even if your application changes! | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Add language identifiers to fenced code blocks per markdown formatting standards.
Seven code blocks are missing language specifiers (MD040 violations). For ASCII diagrams, use ```text or ```plaintext; for shell commands, use ```bash; for test examples, use ```robot.
Apply these diffs to fix the markdown linting violations:
+text "Open Flipkart and search for shoes and then get the first product name" ↓ [4 AI Agents Working Together] ↓ ✅ Working Robot Framework Test (Can run forever) -
+```
```diff
-```
+```plaintext
"Search for 'blue shoes' on the website, verify results appear,
and check that the first product has a price"
-```
+```
-```
+```plaintext
"Login with credentials admin@company.com, navigate to settings,
change password to NewPassword123, and verify success message"
-```
+```-```
+```plaintext
"Fill patient form with John Doe, age 30, select blood type O+,
upload medical record, and submit"
-```
+```-```
+```plaintext
"Create new project, add 3 team members, set privacy to private,
and verify they can access the project"
-```
+```-```
+```plaintext
"Open website on mobile viewport, search for items,
add to cart, and proceed to checkout"
-```
+```+```text
-
YOU: "Go to Google and search for 'cats'"
-
ROBOT THINKS: "OK, let me break that down:
- Step 1: Go to Google.com
- Step 2: Find the search box
- Step 3: Type 'cats'
- Step 4: Press Enter"
-
ROBOT LOOKS: (uses AI eyes to see the website)
"I see a search box with id='search'
I see a search button with class='submit'" -
ROBOT WRITES: (generates test code in Robot Framework)
"Open Browser → Fill Text in search box → Click button" -
ROBOT TESTS: (runs the test in a clean sandbox)
"✅ Test passed! Everything worked!"
-+
Also applies to: 70-70, 78-78, 86-86, 94-94, 102-102, 184-184
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)</summary>
11-11: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In README.md around lines 11, 70, 78, 86, 94, 102 and 184, several fenced code
blocks lack language identifiers; update each opening fence to include the appropriate language specifier (usetext for ASCII diagrams, plaintext for plain text/test examples, bash for shell commands, and robot for Robot Framework examples) so each code block begins with the correct backticks plus language token and leave the existing closing unchanged.
</details>
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
📝 Summary
This PR enhances the README.md to better showcase Mark 1's value proposition and explain how it works in simple terms. The updates make the project more appealing to both developers and non-technical users.
✨ Changes
1. Product Value Proposition 🎯
Added a compelling "What Can Mark 1 Do For You?" section highlighting 4 key benefits:
2. Real-World Use Cases 💼
Added 5 industry-specific scenarios showing practical applications:
Each with specific test descriptions and key benefits demonstrating value.
3. ELI5 Technical Explanation 🏗️
Added "How It Works (Explain Like I'm 5)" section with:
4. Why Choose Mark 1 Comparison Table 🎯
Added a situation-based benefits table showing:
🎯 Addresses Issue
Closes #7 - Enhance README.md to reflect current codebase and usage
📊 Content Changes
✅ Quality Checks
📸 Preview
The README now:
Related Issue: #7
Summary by CodeRabbit