-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
staticaddr: psbt withdrawals #1043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @hieblmi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the static address withdrawal mechanism by integrating Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions (PSBTs). It introduces a new RPC for PSBT-based withdrawals and refactors several core utility functions into a dedicated package, streamlining the process of cooperative transaction signing and improving modularity within the codebase. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new RPC endpoint for PSBT-based withdrawals, ServerPsbtWithdrawDeposits, which enhances the flexibility and security of the withdrawal process by allowing the client to construct the transaction and the server to provide only the necessary signatures. The changes involve significant refactoring, moving common utility functions to a new staticutil package, and updating the withdrawal manager to use the new PSBT flow. The introduction of staticutil improves code organization and reusability. Overall, the changes are well-structured and align with best practices for handling Bitcoin transactions.
94c5f92 to
e387361
Compare
edc5090 to
97d8733
Compare
d9531ac to
bacabe1
Compare
|
@hieblmi, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready |
starius
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 🚀
Added several comments.
| // transaction. | ||
| func (m *Manager) signMusig2Tx(ctx context.Context, | ||
| prevOutFetcher *txscript.MultiPrevOutFetcher, outpoints []wire.OutPoint, | ||
| prevOutFetcher *txscript.MultiPrevOutFetcher, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add tests for signMusig2Tx.
When sigInfo is missing an entry for one of the deposits, the call should error (no partial return). Build a dummy tx with two inputs, provide sessions for both, but only one SigningInfo entry; expect error.
When sigInfo has all expected keys but one maps to the wrong index (mismatched depositsToIdx), ensure it errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for these suggestions, I've added checks and tests as you recommended. I also added a test for the case when an input of the tx is not present in the deposit map, see "tx outpoint not in deposit index map".
staticaddr/withdraw/manager.go
Outdated
|
|
||
| case *btcutil.AddressTaproot: | ||
| weightEstimator.AddP2TROutput() | ||
| func CalculateWithdrawalTxValaues(deposits []*deposit.Deposit, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo: "Valaues"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
| func CalculateWithdrawalTxValaues(deposits []*deposit.Deposit, | ||
| localAmount btcutil.Amount, feeRate chainfee.SatPerKWeight, | ||
| withdrawalAddress btcutil.Address, | ||
| commitmentType lnrpc.CommitmentType) (btcutil.Amount, btcutil.Amount, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a table test for CalculateWithdrawalTxValues covering: insufficient funds after dust/fee, negative change, and min-channel-size guard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added comprehensive test coverage for this function.
bacabe1 to
896ae94
Compare
This PR a new rpc for withdrawals via psbts,