-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
Add Volume deletion validation #68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add Volume deletion validation #68
Conversation
|
Welcome @phuhung273! |
|
Hi @phuhung273. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
Thank you so much, really appreciate for quick help. Unfortunately sanity test is failing. I will try to get it fixed asap :( |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
|
/remove-lifecycle stale Hi @hughdanliu, please help take a look when you have time. Thanks |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
|
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/lifecycle frozen |
|
@gomesjason: The In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: phuhung273 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
The This bot removes
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /remove-lifecycle frozen |
|
Hi @gomesjason do you want me to continue this work after V2 migration ? |
|
If you could rev this PR to be compatible with the SDK v2 migration that would be great! |
Signed-off-by: phuhung273 <phuhung.tranpham@gmail.com>
9d1f864 to
2c42912
Compare
|
Sure thanks for letting me know @gomesjason. I've updated to use SDK v2. |
Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
Deletehandle both JSON string\"fs-1234\"and actual resource IDfs-1234What testing is done?
Unit + Sanity