Skip to content

[CI] Remove unused workflow files to avoid maintainence effort #20553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2025
Merged

[CI] Remove unused workflow files to avoid maintainence effort #20553

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2025

Conversation

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor

@jsji jsji commented Nov 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

These workflow from upstream are not used at all, leaving them here might cause addition maintenance efforts, especially may post security concerns. Remove them.

@jsji jsji requested a review from a team as a code owner November 4, 2025 17:48
@jsji jsji temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock November 4, 2025 17:48 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jsji jsji self-assigned this Nov 4, 2025
aelovikov-intel
aelovikov-intel reviewed Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
sarnex
sarnex approved these changes Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sarnex sarnex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

overall idea is fine with me delta andrei's comments

@jsji jsji temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock November 4, 2025 18:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jsji jsji requested a review from aelovikov-intel November 4, 2025 18:30
@jsji jsji temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock November 4, 2025 18:53 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jsji jsji temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock November 4, 2025 18:53 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor

lukaszstolarczuk commented Nov 4, 2025

nit: If you're removing the whole .ci dir, you could also clean it up from .github/CODEOWNERS (line: .ci/ @intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers)

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsji commented Nov 4, 2025 •
edited
Loading

nit: If you're removing the whole .ci dir, you could also clean it up from .github/CODEOWNERS (line: .ci/ @intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers)

Thanks, but I think we can leave it there just in case some files are being merged due to bad conflict resolutions.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please consider merging

@sarnex sarnex merged commit ffde618 into intel:sycl Nov 4, 2025
28 checks passed
@KornevNikita
Copy link
Contributor

KornevNikita commented Nov 7, 2025

BTW scorecard.yml was also kind of used in this repo. It was reporting vulnerabilities. @intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers should it be restored?

@jsji
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsji commented Nov 7, 2025

BTW scorecard.yml was also kind of used in this repo. It was reporting vulnerabilities. @intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers should it be restored?

#20586

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sarnex sarnex sarnex approved these changes

@uditagarwal97 uditagarwal97 Awaiting requested review from uditagarwal97

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel Awaiting requested review from aelovikov-intel

Assignees

@jsji jsji

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@jsji @lukaszstolarczuk @KornevNikita @sarnex @aelovikov-intel