Skip to content

Conversation

@reporter29
Copy link

@reporter29 reporter29 commented Nov 14, 2025

This request addresses request #184 that I raised to supporting additional proxy formats. I tested my changes using my own proxy. The cases I tested are:

  1. host
  2. host:port
  3. user:pass@host:port
  4. user@host:port
  5. user:pass@host
  6. user@host
  7. host:port:user:pass
  8. host:port@user:pass
  9. users:pass:host:port
  10. user_12345,type_residential,session_123:pass:host.dev.com:1234 (complex valid)
  11. user:pass:host:1080:extra (invalid)
  12. user:pass:https://proxy.host.com:1234 (invalid)

Proxies in the format of 7-9 get saved to the rulesStore as format 3.

EDIT: Ran into some rebasing issues in my previous CR #185 and had to create a new pull request 😅

@reporter29 reporter29 force-pushed the feature/proxy-format-support branch 2 times, most recently from 7930617 to 77faae9 Compare November 14, 2025 03:46
@reporter29 reporter29 force-pushed the feature/proxy-format-support branch from 77faae9 to 2a9181d Compare November 14, 2025 03:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant