Skip to content

Conversation

@go-while
Copy link
Owner

@go-while go-while commented Oct 5, 2025

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 5, 2025 23:19
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces a significant refactor for NNTP article transfer functionality, implementing a worker-based concurrent processing system to replace the previous sequential batch processing. The changes enable parallel CHECK/TAKETHIS operations across multiple workers while maintaining proper synchronization and error handling.

Key Changes

  • Replaced sequential article processing with a multi-worker concurrent system using channels and goroutines
  • Added proper job queuing, worker assignment, and response collection mechanisms
  • Exported previously private fields in BackendConn struct for worker access

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
cmd/nntp-transfer/main.go Complete rewrite of transfer logic to use worker pools and concurrent job processing
internal/nntp/nntp-client.go Exported textConn and writer fields, added new types for job management
internal/nntp/nntp-client-commands.go Added extensive worker management code and job processing structures
internal/nntp/nntp-backend-pool.go Updated field reference to use exported Writer field
internal/nntp/nntp-article-common.go Removed duplicate TakeThisMode type definition
internal/common/headers.go Minor optimization to variable assignment order
internal/common/common.go Added channel-based locking utilities
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

cmd/nntp-transfer/main.go:1

  • Double unlock detected - the mutex is unlocked both in the defer statement and explicitly at line 210, which will cause a panic.
// NNTP article transfer tool for go-pugleaf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants