Skip to content

Conversation

@jescalada
Copy link
Contributor

@jescalada jescalada commented Nov 7, 2025

Fixes #1193.

This PR aims to eliminate redundant types and move existing types into more semantically/logically relevant locations.

It also fixes up some generic variable names in the UI (data/setData, etc.) to make the codebase easier to search/understand.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f14d937
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/endearing-brigadeiros-63f9d0/deploys/690ecfe853e6f500086248c9

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.35%. Comparing base (df6406b) to head (f14d937).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../proxy/processors/push-action/checkAuthorEmails.ts 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1275      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.36%   83.35%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          70       70              
  Lines        3005     3004       -1     
  Branches      499      499              
==========================================
- Hits         2505     2504       -1     
  Misses        397      397              
  Partials      103      103              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jescalada jescalada marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2025 05:13
@jescalada jescalada requested review from a team and andypols November 8, 2025 05:16
Copy link
Contributor

@andypols andypols left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

Just a question out of curiosity — and no need to change anything in this PR — what’s the current thinking on when to append Data or FormData to type/interface names? I know the codebase has been a bit inconsistent, and it’s great that you’re tidying that up here. It’s just not entirely clear to me what the convention is.

Just wondering if Form (and maybe even Data) adds much in AttestationFormData.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consolidate TS types

4 participants