Skip to content

Conversation

@juliendargelos
Copy link

@juliendargelos juliendargelos commented Jul 26, 2018

The npm package is accessible from https://www.npmjs.com/package/lightgl.js, I would transfer ownership if needed (and edit repository url in package.json).

Note that it implies pushing the built lightgl.js file.

@z3dev
Copy link

z3dev commented Sep 3, 2018

Forget it...

@njourdane
Copy link

Hello, I'm also very interested on this.

Publishing an npm package may really facilitate installation workflow for projects using npm.

@njourdane
Copy link

njourdane commented Oct 15, 2018

If you are worried about publishing the lightgl.js file, I don't think it's necessary, since we can build it with a npm script entry in package.json, ie:

"scripts": {
  "postinstall": "python build.py"
}

@z3dev
Copy link

z3dev commented Oct 15, 2018

It’s not a technical problem. This library is not maintained.

@njourdane
Copy link

My bad. Should you recommend an other light alternative to three.js for a new project?

@z3dev
Copy link

z3dev commented Oct 16, 2018

Sorry. I don’t have any recommendations. There are several alternatives, even using WebGL is possible.

@njourdane
Copy link

I found a pretty good list of alternatives, if someone is interested.

Maybe you can archive the project and add a warning on the readme saying this library is not maintained, with a link to this list?

@z3dev
Copy link

z3dev commented Oct 16, 2018

@evanw needs to decide. But I would say that this library needs to be put on ... HOLD

Of course, if someone else wants to support this library...

Toanzzz and others added 2 commits May 5, 2019 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants