feat: implement basic auth for private registry #20
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
In my company we use a private registry (Nexus). Our registry is restricted by a basic authentication.
When we want to execute
npm-consider install --test --production, the command fails when requesting package details because request is unauthorized.So I suggest this feature :
If environment variables
PRIVATE_REGISTRY_USERandPRIVATE_REGISTRY_PASSWORDare provided, then I encode them in base64 and I fillAuthorizationheader in order to perform basic authentication.We have tested it in our environment.
Is it ok for you ?