Skip to content

ENH: new function union1d #495

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ENH: new function union1d #495

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+79 −0

Conversation

@OmarManzoor
Copy link
Contributor

@OmarManzoor OmarManzoor commented Oct 23, 2025

Fixes #491

  • Adds the union1d function.

@lucascolley lucascolley added enhancement New feature or request new function labels Oct 24, 2025
@lucascolley lucascolley changed the title ENH Add union1d ENH: new function union1d Oct 24, 2025
@lucascolley lucascolley self-requested a review October 24, 2025 11:54
@lucascolley lucascolley added this to the 0.9.1 milestone Oct 28, 2025
@lucascolley
Copy link
Member

lucascolley commented Nov 4, 2025

Relevant upstream context from data-apis/array-api#25 @kgryte :

NumPy includes additional set functions (e.g., in1d, intersect1d, isin, setdiff1d, union1d, setxor1d); however, these functions are not widely implemented by other analyzed array libraries ( see here) and, thus, were not included in this initial specification. Should additional set functions be necessary, they can be proposed in follow-up proposals.

Given @paddyroddy's analysis in gh-491, it looks like absence from PyTorch might still be a blocker for inclusion in the standard? If so, probably fine to proceed with this PR.

lucascolley
lucascolley reviewed Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lucascolley lucascolley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @OmarManzoor, looks good!

tests/test_funcs.py
xp_assert_equal(res, expected)


@pytest.mark.skip_xp_backend(Backend.SPARSE, reason="unique_values returns arrays")
Copy link
Member

@lucascolley lucascolley Nov 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the problem here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@OmarManzoor OmarManzoor Nov 7, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we get normal arrays not sparse arrays when using unique_values here.

Copy link
Member

@lucascolley lucascolley Nov 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you check whether this is a documented limitation, and maybe file a bug report upstream if not?

@lucascolley lucascolley requested review from lucascolley and removed request for lucascolley November 7, 2025 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lucascolley lucascolley lucascolley left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

enhancement New feature or request new function

Projects

None yet

Milestone

0.9.1

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ENH: add union1d

2 participants

@OmarManzoor @lucascolley