Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai-dev
Copy link

📄 168% (1.68x) speedup for fetch_all_users in src/asynchrony/various.py

⏱️ Runtime : 275 milliseconds 127 milliseconds (best of 228 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces sequential async execution with concurrent execution using asyncio.gather(), delivering a 116% runtime speedup and 168% throughput improvement.

Key Change: Instead of awaiting each fetch_user call sequentially in a loop, the optimized version uses asyncio.gather(*(fetch_user(user_id) for user_id in user_ids)) to execute all database fetches concurrently.

Why This Works: The original code suffered from additive latency - each 0.0001 second sleep accumulated sequentially. With 20+ user IDs, this meant ~0.002+ seconds of pure waiting time. The optimized version schedules all fetches simultaneously, so the total execution time becomes roughly equal to a single fetch operation rather than the sum of all fetches.

Performance Evidence: The line profiler shows the original code spent 96.3% of its time waiting in the sequential await fetch_user() calls. The optimized version consolidates this into a single concurrent operation, eliminating the sequential bottleneck entirely.

Throughput Impact: The 168% throughput improvement means the system can process 2.7x more user fetch operations per second. This is particularly valuable for workloads that need to fetch multiple users frequently, as the concurrent approach scales much better with batch size.

Test Results: The optimization excels across all test scenarios, with the most dramatic improvements in large-scale tests (100+ user IDs) and concurrent workload tests where the batching effect compounds the benefits. The concurrent execution maintains all correctness guarantees including order preservation and error handling.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 94 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

# unit tests

# 1. Basic Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_empty_list():
    # Test with empty input list
    result = await fetch_all_users([])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_single_user():
    # Test with a single user_id
    result = await fetch_all_users([42])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_multiple_users():
    # Test with multiple user_ids
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i, user_id in enumerate(user_ids):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_negative_and_zero_ids():
    # Test with zero and negative user_ids
    user_ids = [0, -1, -99]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# 2. Edge Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_duplicate_ids():
    # Test with duplicate user_ids
    user_ids = [5, 5, 5]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for user in result:
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_id_values():
    # Test with very large user_ids
    user_ids = [999999999, 2147483647]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_non_integer_ids():
    # Test with non-integer user_ids should raise a TypeError in fetch_user
    user_ids = ["a", 2.5, None]
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_calls():
    # Test concurrent execution of fetch_all_users with different inputs
    ids1 = [1, 2]
    ids2 = [3, 4]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(ids1),
        fetch_all_users(ids2)
    )

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_order_preservation():
    # Test that the order of results matches the order of input user_ids
    user_ids = [7, 3, 9, 1]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# 3. Large Scale Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_list():
    # Test with a large number of user_ids (within reasonable bounds)
    user_ids = list(range(100))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i in range(100):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_large_scale():
    # Test concurrent execution of multiple large fetch_all_users calls
    user_ids1 = list(range(50))
    user_ids2 = list(range(50, 100))
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(user_ids1),
        fetch_all_users(user_ids2)
    )

# 4. Throughput Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_small_load():
    # Throughput test: small load, repeated calls
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    tasks = [fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(10)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    for result in results:
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_medium_load():
    # Throughput test: medium load, moderate number of concurrent calls
    user_ids = list(range(20))
    tasks = [fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(20)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    for result in results:
        for i in range(20):
            pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_high_volume():
    # Throughput test: high volume, many concurrent calls (but under 1000 total)
    user_ids = list(range(50))
    tasks = [fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(15)]  # 15*50=750 total fetches
    results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    for result in results:
        for i in range(50):
            pass
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

# unit tests

# 1. Basic Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_returns_expected_for_single_user():
    # Test with a single user id
    user_ids = [1]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_returns_expected_for_multiple_users():
    # Test with multiple user ids
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i, user_id in enumerate(user_ids):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_returns_empty_for_empty_list():
    # Test with empty user_ids list
    user_ids = []
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# 2. Edge Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_handles_duplicate_user_ids():
    # Test with duplicate user ids
    user_ids = [2, 2, 3]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_handles_negative_and_zero_ids():
    # Test with edge case user ids: negative and zero
    user_ids = [-1, 0, 1]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_invocations():
    # Test concurrent execution of fetch_all_users
    user_ids1 = [1, 2]
    user_ids2 = [3, 4]
    # Run two fetch_all_users concurrently
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(user_ids1),
        fetch_all_users(user_ids2)
    )

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_handles_large_integers():
    # Test with very large user ids
    user_ids = [999999, 2147483647]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_type_error_on_non_int_ids():
    # Test that non-integer user_ids raise TypeError in fetch_user
    # Since fetch_user expects int, passing a string should raise an error
    user_ids = ["a", 2]
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# 3. Large Scale Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_list():
    # Test with a large list of user ids (but <1000 for speed)
    user_ids = list(range(100))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i in range(100):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_large_lists():
    # Test concurrent execution with multiple large lists
    user_ids1 = list(range(50))
    user_ids2 = list(range(50, 100))
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(user_ids1),
        fetch_all_users(user_ids2)
    )
    for i in range(50):
        pass

# 4. Throughput Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_small_load():
    # Throughput test: small load
    user_ids = list(range(10))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i in range(10):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_medium_load():
    # Throughput test: medium load
    user_ids = list(range(100))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i in range(100):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_concurrent_high_load():
    # Throughput test: concurrent high load (multiple batches)
    batch_size = 50
    batches = [list(range(i * batch_size, (i + 1) * batch_size)) for i in range(4)]  # 4 batches of 50
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(fetch_all_users(batch) for batch in batches))
    for batch_idx, batch in enumerate(batches):
        for i, user_id in enumerate(batch):
            pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_sustained_invocations():
    # Throughput test: sustained execution pattern (sequential calls)
    user_ids = [10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
    for _ in range(20):  # 20 sequential invocations
        result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-fetch_all_users-mhqa1mjr and push.

Codeflash

The optimization replaces sequential async execution with concurrent execution using `asyncio.gather()`, delivering a **116% runtime speedup** and **168% throughput improvement**.

**Key Change**: Instead of awaiting each `fetch_user` call sequentially in a loop, the optimized version uses `asyncio.gather(*(fetch_user(user_id) for user_id in user_ids))` to execute all database fetches concurrently.

**Why This Works**: The original code suffered from additive latency - each 0.0001 second sleep accumulated sequentially. With 20+ user IDs, this meant ~0.002+ seconds of pure waiting time. The optimized version schedules all fetches simultaneously, so the total execution time becomes roughly equal to a single fetch operation rather than the sum of all fetches.

**Performance Evidence**: The line profiler shows the original code spent 96.3% of its time waiting in the sequential `await fetch_user()` calls. The optimized version consolidates this into a single concurrent operation, eliminating the sequential bottleneck entirely.

**Throughput Impact**: The 168% throughput improvement means the system can process 2.7x more user fetch operations per second. This is particularly valuable for workloads that need to fetch multiple users frequently, as the concurrent approach scales much better with batch size.

**Test Results**: The optimization excels across all test scenarios, with the most dramatic improvements in large-scale tests (100+ user IDs) and concurrent workload tests where the batching effect compounds the benefits. The concurrent execution maintains all correctness guarantees including order preservation and error handling.
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot requested a review from KRRT7 November 8, 2025 12:45
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Nov 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant