Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai-dev
Copy link

📄 296% (2.96x) speedup for fetch_all_users in src/asynchrony/various.py

⏱️ Runtime : 509 milliseconds 332 milliseconds (best of 190 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces sequential async execution with concurrent execution using asyncio.gather(), delivering a 53% runtime improvement and 296% throughput increase.

Key Change: The original code awaited each fetch_user() call sequentially in a loop, causing total execution time to be the sum of all individual fetch operations. The optimized version uses asyncio.gather(*[fetch_user(user_id) for user_id in user_ids]) to execute all fetch operations concurrently.

Why This Is Faster: In the original implementation, each 0.0001-second asyncio.sleep() call must complete before the next one begins, creating cumulative delay. With asyncio.gather(), all coroutines start simultaneously and the total execution time becomes approximately equal to the longest single operation rather than the sum of all operations. The line profiler shows the optimized version eliminates the loop overhead entirely - the original had 3,265 loop iterations taking 96.3% of execution time, while the optimized version has a single gather operation.

Concurrency Benefits: For I/O-bound operations like database fetches, network requests, or any async operations with waiting periods, this pattern maximizes parallelism. When fetching N users, instead of N × 0.0001 seconds, execution takes roughly 0.0001 seconds total.

Test Case Performance: The optimization excels particularly with larger datasets - tests with 100+ user IDs show dramatic improvements since the benefit scales with the number of concurrent operations. Throughput tests demonstrate the optimization handles high-volume concurrent workloads much better, as evidenced by the 296% throughput increase from 5,472 to 21,660 operations per second.

The optimization maintains identical output ordering and handles all edge cases (empty lists, duplicates, negative IDs) while dramatically improving performance for any workload involving multiple async I/O operations.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 110 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

# unit tests

# 1. Basic Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_empty_list():
    # Test with empty input list
    result = await fetch_all_users([])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_single_user():
    # Test with a single user_id
    result = await fetch_all_users([1])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_multiple_users():
    # Test with multiple user_ids
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    expected = [
        {"id": 1, "name": "User1"},
        {"id": 2, "name": "User2"},
        {"id": 3, "name": "User3"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_non_sequential_ids():
    # Test with non-sequential user_ids
    user_ids = [10, 5, 99]
    expected = [
        {"id": 10, "name": "User10"},
        {"id": 5, "name": "User5"},
        {"id": 99, "name": "User99"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# 2. Edge Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_duplicate_ids():
    # Test with duplicate user_ids
    user_ids = [1, 1, 2]
    expected = [
        {"id": 1, "name": "User1"},
        {"id": 1, "name": "User1"},
        {"id": 2, "name": "User2"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_negative_and_zero_ids():
    # Test with zero and negative user_ids
    user_ids = [0, -1, -99]
    expected = [
        {"id": 0, "name": "User0"},
        {"id": -1, "name": "User-1"},
        {"id": -99, "name": "User-99"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_id_values():
    # Test with very large user_ids
    user_ids = [2**31, 999999999, 123456789012345]
    expected = [
        {"id": 2**31, "name": f"User{2**31}"},
        {"id": 999999999, "name": "User999999999"},
        {"id": 123456789012345, "name": "User123456789012345"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_execution():
    # Test concurrent calls to fetch_all_users
    user_ids_1 = [1, 2]
    user_ids_2 = [3, 4]
    expected_1 = [{"id": 1, "name": "User1"}, {"id": 2, "name": "User2"}]
    expected_2 = [{"id": 3, "name": "User3"}, {"id": 4, "name": "User4"}]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(user_ids_1),
        fetch_all_users(user_ids_2)
    )

@pytest.mark.asyncio

async def test_fetch_all_users_large_list():
    # Test with a large list of user_ids (up to 500 for speed)
    user_ids = list(range(500))
    expected = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in user_ids]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_large_lists():
    # Test concurrent execution with large lists
    user_ids_1 = list(range(100, 200))
    user_ids_2 = list(range(200, 300))
    expected_1 = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in user_ids_1]
    expected_2 = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in user_ids_2]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(user_ids_1),
        fetch_all_users(user_ids_2)
    )

# 4. Throughput Test Cases

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_small_load():
    # Throughput test: small load, multiple rapid calls
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        *(fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(10))
    )
    for result in results:
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_medium_load():
    # Throughput test: medium load, moderate number of calls
    user_ids = list(range(50))
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        *(fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(5))
    )
    expected = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in user_ids]
    for result in results:
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_high_volume():
    # Throughput test: high volume, many concurrent calls with moderate data size
    user_ids = list(range(20))
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        *(fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(50))
    )
    expected = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in user_ids]
    for result in results:
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_varying_sizes():
    # Throughput test: calls with varying sizes of user_ids
    sizes = [0, 1, 10, 100]
    user_ids_lists = [list(range(size)) for size in sizes]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        *(fetch_all_users(ids) for ids in user_ids_lists)
    )
    for ids, result in zip(user_ids_lists, results):
        expected = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in ids]
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
import asyncio  # used to run async functions

import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

# unit tests

# ---------------------- Basic Test Cases ----------------------

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_empty_list():
    """Test fetch_all_users with an empty list returns an empty list."""
    result = await fetch_all_users([])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_single_user():
    """Test fetch_all_users with a single user ID."""
    result = await fetch_all_users([5])

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_multiple_users():
    """Test fetch_all_users with multiple user IDs."""
    user_ids = [1, 2, 3]
    expected = [
        {"id": 1, "name": "User1"},
        {"id": 2, "name": "User2"},
        {"id": 3, "name": "User3"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_order_preserved():
    """Test that the order of users in the result matches the input order."""
    user_ids = [10, 5, 7]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    ids_in_result = [user["id"] for user in result]

# ---------------------- Edge Test Cases ----------------------

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_duplicate_ids():
    """Test fetch_all_users with duplicate user IDs."""
    user_ids = [2, 2, 3]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    expected = [
        {"id": 2, "name": "User2"},
        {"id": 2, "name": "User2"},
        {"id": 3, "name": "User3"},
    ]

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_negative_and_zero_ids():
    """Test fetch_all_users with negative and zero user IDs."""
    user_ids = [-1, 0, 1]
    expected = [
        {"id": -1, "name": "User-1"},
        {"id": 0, "name": "User0"},
        {"id": 1, "name": "User1"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio

async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_invocation():
    """Test concurrent execution of fetch_all_users with different inputs."""
    ids1 = [1, 2]
    ids2 = [3, 4]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(ids1),
        fetch_all_users(ids2)
    )

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_ids():
    """Test fetch_all_users with very large integer IDs."""
    user_ids = [999999999, 1234567890]
    expected = [
        {"id": 999999999, "name": "User999999999"},
        {"id": 1234567890, "name": "User1234567890"},
    ]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

# ---------------------- Large Scale Test Cases ----------------------

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_large_list():
    """Test fetch_all_users with a large list of user IDs (e.g., 100 users)."""
    user_ids = list(range(100))
    expected = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in range(100)]
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_concurrent_large_scale():
    """Test multiple concurrent fetch_all_users calls with large lists."""
    ids1 = list(range(50))
    ids2 = list(range(50, 100))
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        fetch_all_users(ids1),
        fetch_all_users(ids2)
    )
    expected1 = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in range(50)]
    expected2 = [{"id": i, "name": f"User{i}"} for i in range(50, 100)]

# ---------------------- Throughput Test Cases ----------------------

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_small_load():
    """Throughput: Test fetch_all_users performance with a small load."""
    user_ids = list(range(10))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i, user in enumerate(result):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_medium_load():
    """Throughput: Test fetch_all_users performance with a medium load."""
    user_ids = list(range(100))
    result = await fetch_all_users(user_ids)
    for i, user in enumerate(result):
        pass

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_concurrent_high_load():
    """Throughput: Test concurrent fetch_all_users calls under high load."""
    # Each call fetches 100 users, 5 concurrent calls
    user_id_batches = [list(range(i*100, (i+1)*100)) for i in range(5)]
    results = await asyncio.gather(
        *(fetch_all_users(batch) for batch in user_id_batches)
    )
    for batch_idx, batch_result in enumerate(results):
        for i, user in enumerate(batch_result):
            expected_id = batch_idx * 100 + i

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_fetch_all_users_throughput_sustained_pattern():
    """Throughput: Test sustained repeated execution pattern."""
    user_ids = list(range(20))
    # Call fetch_all_users 10 times in quick succession
    results = await asyncio.gather(*(fetch_all_users(user_ids) for _ in range(10)))
    for idx, result in enumerate(results):
        for i, user in enumerate(result):
            pass
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
from src.asynchrony.various import fetch_all_users

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-fetch_all_users-mhq6vnce and push.

Codeflash

The optimization replaces sequential async execution with concurrent execution using `asyncio.gather()`, delivering a **53% runtime improvement** and **296% throughput increase**.

**Key Change**: The original code awaited each `fetch_user()` call sequentially in a loop, causing total execution time to be the sum of all individual fetch operations. The optimized version uses `asyncio.gather(*[fetch_user(user_id) for user_id in user_ids])` to execute all fetch operations concurrently.

**Why This Is Faster**: In the original implementation, each 0.0001-second `asyncio.sleep()` call must complete before the next one begins, creating cumulative delay. With `asyncio.gather()`, all coroutines start simultaneously and the total execution time becomes approximately equal to the longest single operation rather than the sum of all operations. The line profiler shows the optimized version eliminates the loop overhead entirely - the original had 3,265 loop iterations taking 96.3% of execution time, while the optimized version has a single gather operation.

**Concurrency Benefits**: For I/O-bound operations like database fetches, network requests, or any async operations with waiting periods, this pattern maximizes parallelism. When fetching N users, instead of N × 0.0001 seconds, execution takes roughly 0.0001 seconds total.

**Test Case Performance**: The optimization excels particularly with larger datasets - tests with 100+ user IDs show dramatic improvements since the benefit scales with the number of concurrent operations. Throughput tests demonstrate the optimization handles high-volume concurrent workloads much better, as evidenced by the 296% throughput increase from 5,472 to 21,660 operations per second.

The optimization maintains identical output ordering and handles all edge cases (empty lists, duplicates, negative IDs) while dramatically improving performance for any workload involving multiple async I/O operations.
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot requested a review from KRRT7 November 8, 2025 11:16
@codeflash-ai-dev codeflash-ai-dev bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Nov 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant