⚡️ Speed up function retry_with_backoff by -81%
#168
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 -81% (-0.81x) speedup for
retry_with_backoffinsrc/asynchrony/various.py⏱️ Runtime :
5.66 milliseconds→29.5 milliseconds(best of233runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces the blocking
time.sleep()call with the non-blockingawait asyncio.sleep(), which is a critical fix for async functions. However, the performance results show a counterintuitive pattern that reveals important nuances about async optimization.Key Change:
time.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)withawait asyncio.sleep(0.0001 * attempt)import asyncioto support the async sleep functionalityWhy This Matters:
The original code uses
time.sleep(), which blocks the entire event loop during backoff delays. This prevents other coroutines from running concurrently and violates async best practices. The optimized version usesawait asyncio.sleep(), which yields control back to the event loop, allowing other async operations to proceed during the delay.Performance Analysis:
The line profiler shows the sleep operation went from 62.6% of total time (5.638ms) in the original to 25.1% (1.145ms) in the optimized version - a 79% reduction in sleep overhead. However, individual test runtime appears higher in the optimized version because:
Throughput Benefits:
The 6.4% throughput improvement (153,738 → 163,566 ops/sec) demonstrates the optimization's value under concurrent load. The annotated tests show this particularly benefits scenarios with:
Impact:
This optimization is essential for any async application where
retry_with_backoffmight be called concurrently. The blocking sleep would create a bottleneck preventing proper async behavior, while the optimized version maintains event loop responsiveness and enables true concurrency.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-retry_with_backoff-mhq3zgydand push.