⚡️ Speed up method BCDataStream.read_int16 by 36%
#49
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 36% (0.36x) speedup for
BCDataStream.read_int16inelectrum/transaction.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.61 milliseconds→1.18 milliseconds(best of12runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 36% speedup by eliminating function call overhead and replacing dynamic calculations with hardcoded constants.
Key optimizations applied:
Inlined function call: The original code delegated to
_read_num('<h'), requiring a function call with parameter passing. The optimized version inlines this logic directly inread_int16(), eliminating the call overhead entirely.Hardcoded size calculation: Instead of calling
struct.calcsize('<h')every time (which always returns 2 for a signed 16-bit integer), the optimized version uses the literal2. This removes a function call and string parsing overhead.Performance impact analysis:
From the line profiler results, the original version spent significant time in the function call mechanism itself - the
read_int16method took 15.6ms total time just to call_read_num. The optimized version reduces this to 4.77ms by handling everything inline.The
struct.unpack_fromoperation time remains similar (1.77ms vs 1.88ms), but eliminating thestruct.calcsizecall saves substantial overhead, especially in the cursor increment operation (1.52ms vs 1.27ms).Test case performance:
The optimization shows consistent 35-57% improvements across all test scenarios:
This optimization is particularly effective for Bitcoin transaction parsing workloads where
read_int16is called frequently during deserialization of binary data streams, making the function call elimination and constant folding highly beneficial.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-BCDataStream.read_int16-mhokk9buand push.