-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
past trials for code repair #954
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **15% speedup** through several targeted micro-optimizations that reduce computational overhead in the parsing loop:
**Key Optimizations:**
1. **Single-pass boundary search**: Instead of checking both conditions (`start_line != -1 and end_line != -1`) on every iteration, the optimized version uses `None` values and breaks immediately when both markers are found, eliminating redundant condition checks.
2. **Fast-path string matching**: Before calling the expensive `.startswith("_______")` method, it first checks if `line[0] == "_"`, avoiding the method call for most lines that don't start with underscores.
3. **Method lookup optimization**: Pulls `current_failure_lines.append` into a local variable to avoid repeated attribute lookups in the hot loop where failure lines are processed.
4. **Memory-efficient list management**: Uses `current_failure_lines.clear()` instead of creating new list objects (`current_failure_lines = []`), reducing object allocation pressure.
**Performance Impact:**
The optimizations show the most significant gains in large-scale scenarios:
- **Large failure sets**: 14.2% faster with 500 failures, 14.0% faster with 999 failures
- **Large output**: 29.2% faster for single failures with 1000 lines of output
- **Complex scenarios**: 22.3% faster with 50 cases having 10 lines each
**Hot Path Context:**
Based on the function reference, `parse_test_failures_from_stdout` is called from `parse_test_results`, which appears to be part of a test optimization pipeline. The function processes pytest stdout to extract failure information, making it performance-critical when dealing with large test suites or verbose test outputs. The 15% improvement becomes meaningful when processing hundreds of test failures in CI/CD environments or during iterative code optimization workflows.
…25-11-27T14.49.01 ⚡️ Speed up function `parse_test_failures_from_stdout` by 16% in PR #945 (`feat/feedback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results`)
…b.com:codeflash-ai/codeflash into feat/feedback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results
…b.com:codeflash-ai/codeflash into feat/feedback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results
Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…b.com:codeflash-ai/codeflash into feat/feedback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results
…b.com:codeflash-ai/codeflash into feat/feedback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results
…edback-loop-for-unmatched-test-results
|
Codeflash Bot seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
PR Type
Enhancement, Tests
Description
Add AI-powered code repair workflow
Track candidate source across pipeline
Return detailed test comparison diffs
Parse pytest failures from stdout
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
5 files
Add code-repair API and candidate source taggingAdd TestDiffs, repair request, and source enumIntegrate repair queue, dedupe helpers, and source-aware flowReturn (match, diffs) and capture pytest errorsParse pytest failures per test from stdout5 files
Adapt tests to new compare_test_results APIUpdate comparator tests for tuple returnAdjust assertions to match new APIUpdate assertions and add match unpackingAlign pickle patcher tests with new comparison