Skip to content

Conversation

@misrasaurabh1
Copy link
Contributor

@misrasaurabh1 misrasaurabh1 commented Nov 18, 2025

PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Add common tags computation utility

  • Implement tests for multiple article sets


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Articles list"] -- "iterate and intersect tags" --> B["Common tags list"]
  B["Common tags list"] -- "convert to set" --> C["Result set"]
  T1["Unit tests"] -- "validate for 3 and 4 articles" --> B
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
common_tags.py
Introduce common tags utility function                                     

codeflash/result/common_tags.py

  • Introduce find_common_tags function.
  • Handle empty input returning empty set.
  • Iteratively intersect tags across articles.
  • Return result as a set of strings.
+11/-0   
Tests
test_common_tags.py
Add tests for common tags utility                                               

tests/test_common_tags.py

  • Add unit test for three-article case.
  • Reuse expected set for four-article case.
  • Validate identical common tags across inputs.
+22/-0   

@github-actions
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 PR contains tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Algorithmic Efficiency

The current approach filters a list repeatedly, resulting in O(nmk) behavior. Consider using set intersections to reduce complexity and improve readability, especially as article counts or tag lists grow.

common_tags = articles[0].get("tags", [])
for article in articles[1:]:
    common_tags = [tag for tag in common_tags if tag in article.get("tags", [])]
return set(common_tags)
Input Robustness

The function assumes articles contain a 'tags' list of strings. If tags include duplicates or non-string items, behavior may be unexpected. Consider normalizing to sets and validating types or documenting expectations.

def find_common_tags(articles: list[dict[str, list[str]]]) -> set[str]:
    if not articles:
        return set()

    common_tags = articles[0].get("tags", [])
    for article in articles[1:]:
        common_tags = [tag for tag in common_tags if tag in article.get("tags", [])]
    return set(common_tags)

@github-actions
Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Use set intersections

Convert to set intersection to avoid O(n^2) scans and handle duplicates
deterministically. This also avoids repeated list rebuilds and yields the final set
directly.

codeflash/result/common_tags.py [8-11]

-common_tags = articles[0].get("tags", [])
+common_tags = set(articles[0].get("tags", []))
 for article in articles[1:]:
-    common_tags = [tag for tag in common_tags if tag in article.get("tags", [])]
-return set(common_tags)
+    common_tags &= set(article.get("tags", []))
+return common_tags
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

__

Why: Correctly replaces list filtering with set intersections, improving performance and handling duplicates while preserving behavior. The 'existing_code' matches the new hunk and the 'improved_code' accurately reflects the suggested change.

Medium

Co-authored-by: codeflash-ai[bot] <148906541+codeflash-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@codeflash-ai
Copy link
Contributor

codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

This PR is now faster! 🚀 Saurabh Misra accepted my code suggestion above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants