Skip to content

Conversation

@ripytide
Copy link

@ripytide ripytide commented Feb 4, 2024

This makes the library more flexible to allow users more easily use newtype wrappers for things like std::ops::Sub, such as for use-cases mentioned in #21

Based off of #22, so that should probably be merged first if this is to be merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants