Skip to content

Conversation

@Joy-less
Copy link
Contributor

@Joy-less Joy-less commented Feb 5, 2025

This is just a readability thing. Use Timeout.InfiniteTimeSpan not new TimeSpan(0, 0, 0, 0, -1).

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 99.169% (+0.02%) from 99.152%
when pulling 3c25cfc on Joy-less:use-timeout.infinitetimespan
into da00197 on bitfaster:main.

Copy link
Owner

@bitfaster bitfaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Joy-less Joy-less mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2025
@bitfaster bitfaster merged commit 0c6dd7f into bitfaster:main Feb 13, 2025
13 checks passed
@Joy-less Joy-less deleted the use-timeout.infinitetimespan branch February 13, 2025 22:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants