Skip to content

Conversation

@Veera-mulge
Copy link
Contributor

@Veera-mulge Veera-mulge commented Nov 18, 2025

What does this PR do?

(Provide a description of what this PR does.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work.)

Related PRs and Issues

(If this PR is related to any other PR or resolves any issue or related to any issue link all related PR and issues here.)

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

(Write your answer here.)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Published a comprehensive blog post on vector databases: explains embeddings, similarity search and ANN indexing; profiles six platforms (MongoDB Atlas, Chroma, Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, Qdrant); includes guidance on choosing, conclusion, resources, and full post metadata for better discovery and sharing.
  • Chores
    • Added a workspace configuration to streamline handling of certain build-time dependencies.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request adds two new files: a blog post at src/routes/blog/post/top-6-vector-databases-2025/+page.markdoc containing front-matter (layout, title, description, date, cover, timeToRead, author, category, featured, callToAction, unlisted) and the article content covering vector database concepts and six vendors; and pnpm-workspace.yaml with a top-level onlyBuiltDependencies array listing packages to treat as built during PNPM workspace operations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Changes are limited to one content file and one workspace config file.
  • Review focus:
    • src/routes/blog/post/top-6-vector-databases-2025/+page.markdoc: front-matter accuracy, links, image paths, formatting, and content correctness.
    • pnpm-workspace.yaml: YAML syntax and validity of the onlyBuiltDependencies list.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Vector Databases blog' is directly related to the main change, which adds a comprehensive blog post about vector databases and updates workspace configuration.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch vector-databases-blog

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a7a06d and a25267e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • static/images/blog/top-6-vector-databases-2025/cover.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: assets
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)

1-7: Clarify why workspace configuration is being changed in a blog post PR.

This new pnpm workspace configuration appears unrelated to the blog content being added. The packages listed (native/compiled dependencies) are appropriate for onlyBuiltDependencies, but the contextual mismatch raises questions.

  • Is this change intentional, or was it accidentally bundled with the blog content?
  • If intentional, why is this workspace configuration change needed alongside the blog post?
  • Were there build issues encountered that necessitate this configuration?

Additionally, consider adding an inline comment explaining the rationale for this configuration to aid future maintainers:

+# Use prebuilt binaries for packages with native dependencies to improve build performance
 onlyBuiltDependencies:
   - '@parcel/watcher'
   - '@sentry/cli'
   - core-js
   - esbuild
   - sharp
   - ttf2woff2

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f408b42 and ce50996.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • static/images/blog/top-6-vector-databases-2025/cover.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/routes/blog/post/top-6-vector-databases-2025/+page.markdoc (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: tests
  • GitHub Check: assets
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/routes/blog/post/top-6-vector-databases-2025/+page.markdoc (3)

1-12: Verify front matter configuration is correct.

The post is marked as unlisted: true, featured: false, and callToAction: true. Confirm this configuration aligns with your publication intent. If this is intended for public discovery in 2025, consider whether unlisted: true is intentional.


14-145: Content quality looks solid—good technical depth and structure.

The post effectively explains vector database concepts (embeddings, similarity search, ANN indexing techniques), provides balanced coverage of six options with consistent feature breakdowns, and concludes with practical selection guidance. Once the three issues above are fixed, this should be ready for publication.


147-150: All referenced blog posts exist and links are correct.

Verification confirms all three internal blog post links in the "More resources" section exist at their specified paths:

  • choosing-the-right-ai-database/+page.markdoc
  • tanstack-start-support-in-appwrite-sites/+page.markdoc
  • unlimited-appwrite-sites-free-plan/+page.markdoc

Veera-mulge and others added 3 commits November 18, 2025 21:59
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@ebenezerdon ebenezerdon merged commit 5900023 into main Nov 24, 2025
6 checks passed
@ebenezerdon ebenezerdon deleted the vector-databases-blog branch November 24, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants