-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
Implement predict, returned, logjoint, ... with fast eval
#1130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
penelopeysm
wants to merge
9
commits into
py/fastldf
Choose a base branch
from
py/fasteverythingelse
base: py/fastldf
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+100
−139
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a494d00
Make InitContext work with OnlyAccsVarInfo
penelopeysm 35432c0
Do not convert NamedTuple to Dict
penelopeysm f330d59
remove logging
penelopeysm 7deaaab
Enable InitFromPrior and InitFromUniform too
penelopeysm 699aa23
Fix `infer_nested_eltype` invocation
penelopeysm c188b7e
Use OnlyAccsVarInfo for many re-evaluation functions
penelopeysm 5a976fd
Generalise eltype inference
penelopeysm 8902e6a
Make it more elegant
penelopeysm 1d79c7f
Fix bug
penelopeysm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fundamentally, all the functions in this extension really just use this under the hood.
FWIW the FlexiChains extension has a very similar structure and I believe these can be unified pretty much immediately after this PR. To be specific,
DynamicPPL.reevaluate_with_chainshould be implemented by each chain type in the most performant manner (FlexiChains doesn't useInitFromParams), but the definitions ofreturned,logjoint, ...,pointwise_logdensities, ... can be shared.predictcan't yet be shared unfortunately, because theinclude_allkeyword argument forces custom MCMCChains / FlexiChains code. That would require an extension of the AbstractChains API to support asubset-like operation.