Skip to content

Conversation

@michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Nov 7, 2025

Resolves #17612

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Retrieve order details by ID
    • Retrieve return information by ID
    • List events for a specific order
    • New selectable Order and Return fields in the Monta integration UI
  • Chores
    • Monta integration package bumped to 0.1.0 and updated platform dependency

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 7, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs Ignored Ignored Nov 7, 2025 5:20pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit Ignored Ignored Nov 7, 2025 5:20pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds three new Monta action modules (get order, get return, list order events), extends the Monta app with propDefinitions and several HTTP helper/API methods, introduces axios usage, and updates package.json version and dependencies.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New Action Modules
components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs, components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs, components/monta/actions/list-order-events/list-order-events.mjs
Added three action modules that export default action objects (metadata, props including monta and relevant IDs, and a run async function). Each action calls the corresponding app method (getOrder, getReturn, listOrderEvents), exports a success summary, and returns the API response.
App Integration Layer
components/monta/monta.app.mjs
Added propDefinitions for orderId and returnId (with async options), introduced methods _baseUrl(), _makeRequest(), and API helpers (getOrder, getReturn, listOrders, listReturns, listOrderEvents), removed prior authKeys() method, and imported axios from @pipedream/platform.
Package Configuration
components/monta/package.json
Bumped package version from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 and added dependency "@pipedream/platform": "^3.1.0".

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Action as Action Module
    participant App as monta.app.mjs
    participant HTTP as `@pipedream/platform` (axios)
    participant API as Monta API

    Action->>App: call getOrder/getReturn/listOrderEvents($, ids, params)
    App->>App: _makeRequest(path, opts)
    App->>HTTP: axios({ method, url, auth, params, ... })
    HTTP->>API: HTTP Request
    API-->>HTTP: Response
    HTTP-->>App: Response Data
    App-->>Action: return data
    Action->>Action: $.export("summary", ...)
    Action-->>User: action result
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Areas needing extra attention:
    • Verify _makeRequest() implements authentication and error handling correctly.
    • Confirm propDefinitions async options correctly call and map listOrders / listReturns.
    • Ensure API helper methods use correct Monta endpoints and parameter names (orderId, returnId, channel).
    • Check consistency of summary messages and absence/handling of errors in action run functions.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is minimal, containing only "Resolves #17612" without addressing the template's WHY section or explaining the changes made in detail. Expand the description to include a WHY section explaining the purpose, summarize what was implemented, and highlight which requirements from issue #17612 were addressed.
Linked Issues check ⚠️ Warning The PR implements only 3 of 5 requested actions (get-order, get-return, list-order-events) from issue #17612; missing are get-orderlines, get-consumer, get-tracktrace, and get-shipment endpoints. Either implement the remaining required actions (get-orderlines, get-consumer, get-tracktrace, get-shipment) or clarify in the issue whether this is a partial implementation with follow-up PRs planned.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Monta - new components" is vague and generic; it mentions adding components but doesn't specify which actions or features are being implemented. Replace with a more specific title like "Add Monta get-order, get-return, and list-order-events actions" to clearly indicate the primary changes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are scoped to implementing Monta integration actions and supporting infrastructure; no unrelated modifications detected.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch issue-17612

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73db8da and 9a7f650.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1)
components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs (1)
  • response (33-36)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (4)

1-2: LGTM!

The import statement correctly references the Monta app module.


3-13: LGTM!

The action metadata is well-defined, and the documentation link has been corrected to point to the appropriate Order endpoint. The annotations correctly reflect that this is a read-only, non-destructive action.


14-28: LGTM!

The props are well-defined, leveraging propDefinitions for consistency. The typo in the channel description has been corrected ("available" instead of "avalaible").


29-41: LGTM!

The run method correctly invokes the Monta API, passes parameters appropriately, and exports a clear summary. The implementation is consistent with other actions in the PR and follows Pipedream best practices.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49175b5 and 73db8da.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/monta/actions/list-order-events/list-order-events.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/monta/monta.app.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/monta/package.json (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-15T22:01:11.472Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 18362
File: components/leonardo_ai/actions/generate-image/generate-image.mjs:103-105
Timestamp: 2025-09-15T22:01:11.472Z
Learning: In Pipedream components, pipedream/platform's axios implementation automatically excludes undefined values from HTTP requests, so there's no need to manually check for truthiness before including properties in request payloads.

Applied to files:

  • components/monta/monta.app.mjs
📚 Learning: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learnt from: GTFalcao
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 16954
File: components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs:14-23
Timestamp: 2025-06-04T17:52:05.780Z
Learning: In the Salesloft API integration (components/salesloft/salesloft.app.mjs), the _makeRequest method returns response.data which directly contains arrays for list endpoints like listPeople, listCadences, listUsers, and listAccounts. The propDefinitions correctly call .map() directly on these responses without needing to destructure a nested data property.

Applied to files:

  • components/monta/monta.app.mjs
📚 Learning: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learnt from: jcortes
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json` dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.

Applied to files:

  • components/monta/package.json
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1)
components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs (1)
  • response (33-36)
components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs (1)
components/monta/actions/get-order/get-order.mjs (1)
  • response (30-36)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/monta/package.json (1)

1-18: LGTM!

The version bump to 0.1.0 and the addition of the @pipedream/platform dependency are appropriate for this feature addition.

components/monta/actions/list-order-events/list-order-events.mjs (1)

1-35: LGTM!

The action structure is well-implemented with correct pluralization logic in the summary message.

components/monta/actions/get-return/get-return.mjs (1)

1-41: LGTM!

The action correctly implements the dependency between orderId and returnId props, allowing the return options to be filtered by order.

components/monta/monta.app.mjs (2)

39-53: LGTM on the request helper implementation.

The _makeRequest method correctly uses axios with basic authentication from this.$auth credentials. The structure follows Pipedream best practices.


54-91: Verify API endpoint paths against Monta API v6 official documentation.

I found references to Monta API v6 documentation at https://api-v6.monta.nl/index.html in the action files, which suggests official docs exist. However, the public OpenAPI specs are not readily indexed by standard search.

The evidence indicates potential issues:

  • Action files reference singular paths: /order/{webshoporderid}/events, /return/{id}
  • Implementation mixes singular and plural: /orders, /returns, /order, /return

To verify the correct endpoint paths, you should:

  1. Check the official Monta API v6 OpenAPI spec at https://api-v6.monta.nl/index.html
  2. Confirm whether paths should be /orders/, /returns/ (plural) or /order/, /return/ (singular)
  3. Verify the property names in API responses (capitalized Id, Returns) match the implementation

Copy link
Collaborator

@luancazarine luancazarine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @michelle0927, LGTM! Ready for QA!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[APP] Monta

3 participants