Skip to content

Conversation

@philipwindecker
Copy link
Contributor

@philipwindecker philipwindecker commented Oct 22, 2024

Added links to interface specification pages.

#### Reference to a related issue in the repository
#836

Add a description

Add missing pages for top-level messages in chapter 2.2.2.
Add links to specification for each top-level message.

Take this checklist as orientation for yourself, if this PR is ready for the Change Control Board:

If you can’t check all of them, please explain why.
If all boxes are checked or commented and you have achieved at least one positive review, you can assign the label ReadyForCCBReview!

Added links to interface specification pages.

Signed-off-by: Philip WINDECKER (AVENYR GmbH) <philip.windecker@avenyr.de>
@philipwindecker philipwindecker linked an issue Oct 22, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@philipwindecker philipwindecker self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
@philipwindecker philipwindecker added the ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB. label Oct 22, 2024
@jdsika jdsika added the Documentation Everything which impacts the quality of the documentation and guidelines. label Nov 14, 2024
@jdsika jdsika added this to the V3.7.1 milestone Nov 14, 2024
@jdsika jdsika merged commit e78dff7 into master Nov 14, 2024
10 checks passed
@jdsika jdsika deleted the 836-documentation-of-some-top-level-messages-is-missing branch November 14, 2024 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Documentation Everything which impacts the quality of the documentation and guidelines. ReadyForCCBReview Indicates that this PR is ready for a final review and merge by the CCB.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Documentation of some top-level messages is missing

4 participants