Skip to content

Conversation

@Cyb0rgzz
Copy link
Owner

@Cyb0rgzz Cyb0rgzz commented Nov 7, 2025

Test

@Cyb0rgzz
Copy link
Owner Author

Cyb0rgzz commented Nov 7, 2025

🔍 Pull Request Feedback

🔒 No security issues identified

⚡ Recommended areas for review

💡 Code Smell

Issue 11fenil11#3 🔄 (PENDING)

📄 src/algo_Calc/Sortingss.java (Line 753)

Problem: Use of System.out.println instead of logging framework

System.out.println(ew.toString());

Recommendation: Replace with a proper logging framework like SLF4J or Log4j. Example: logger.info("Processing: {}", i);


Issue 11fenil11#4 🔄 (PENDING)

📄 src/algo_Calc/Sortingss.java (Line 771)

Problem: Use of System.out.println instead of logging framework

System.out.println(ew.toString());

Recommendation: Replace with a proper logging framework like SLF4J or Log4j. Example: logger.info("Processing: {}", i);


Issue #5 🔄 (PENDING)

📄 src/algo_Calc/Sortingss.java (Line 789)

Problem: Use of System.out.println instead of logging framework

System.out.println(ew.toString());

Recommendation: Replace with a proper logging framework like SLF4J or Log4j. Example: logger.info("Processing: {}", i);


⚡ Performance Issue

Issue #1 🔄 (PENDING)

📄 src/algo_Calc/Sortingss.java (Line 547)

Problem: Potential inefficient loop

Recommendation: Consider: Using a logging framework with appropriate log levels, batch processing if printing is necessary, or StringBuilder for string concatenation in loops.


Issue 11fenil11#2 🔄 (PENDING)

📄 src/algo_Calc/Sortingss.java (Line 555)

Problem: Potential inefficient loop

Recommendation: Consider: Using a logging framework with appropriate log levels, batch processing if printing is necessary, or StringBuilder for string concatenation in loops.


📊 Review Summary

  • Total Issues: 8
  • Critical: 0 | Medium: 6 | Warning: 0 | Low: 2
  • Accepted: 0 | Deferred: 0

🤖 Automated code review by AI Code Review Bot

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants