Add draft spec for WithCertificate API #5587
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Introduced a draft specification for the `WithCertificate` API, detailing goals, new types, overloads, and example usage for Bearer and mTLS authentication.
bgavrilMS
reviewed
Nov 20, 2025
| ### 2.1 `ClientCertificateUsage` | ||
|
|
||
| ```csharp | ||
| public enum ClientCertificateUsage |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
THere is no need for this? It should be derived from the context?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you suggesting we add a a request‑level WithMutualTls() to opt into Bearer over mTLS?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduced a draft specification for the
WithCertificateAPI, detailing goals, new types, overloads, and example usage for Bearer and mTLS authentication.