Merge pull request #59192 from apple/rdar94175237

[Sema] Check `@_typeEraser` SPI visibility

Author: rxwei

include/swift/AST/DiagnosticsSema.def

@@ -5488,6 +5488,9 @@ NOTE(type_eraser_init_not_accessible,none,
      "cannot have more restrictive access than protocol %1 "
      "(which is %select{private|fileprivate|internal|public|open}2)",
      (AccessLevel, Type, AccessLevel))
+NOTE(type_eraser_init_spi,none,
+     "'init(erasing:)' is SPI, but protocol %0 is not"
+     "%select{| in the same SPI groups as 'init(erasing:)'}1", (Type, bool))
 
 //------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // MARK: @available

lib/Sema/TypeCheckAttr.cpp

@@ -3022,6 +3022,7 @@ TypeEraserHasViableInitRequest::evaluate(Evaluator &evaluator,
     Failable,
     UnsatisfiedRequirements,
     Inaccessible,
+    SPI,
   };
   SmallVector<std::tuple<ConstructorDecl *, UnviableReason, Type>, 2> unviable;
 
@@ -3084,6 +3085,28 @@ TypeEraserHasViableInitRequest::evaluate(Evaluator &evaluator,
       return false;
     }
 
+    if (init->isSPI()) {
+      if (!protocol->isSPI()) {
+        unviable.push_back(
+            std::make_tuple(init, UnviableReason::SPI, genericParamType));
+        return false;
+      }
+      auto protocolSPIGroups = protocol->getSPIGroups();
+      auto initSPIGroups = init->getSPIGroups();
+      // If both are SPI, `init(erasing:)` must be available in all of the
+      // protocol's SPI groups.
+      // TODO: Do this more efficiently?
+      for (auto protocolGroup : protocolSPIGroups) {
+        auto foundIt = std::find(
+            initSPIGroups.begin(), initSPIGroups.end(), protocolGroup);
+        if (foundIt == initSPIGroups.end()) {
+          unviable.push_back(
+              std::make_tuple(init, UnviableReason::SPI, genericParamType));
+          return false;
+        }
+      }
+    }
+
     return true;
   });
 
@@ -3113,8 +3136,12 @@ TypeEraserHasViableInitRequest::evaluate(Evaluator &evaluator,
         break;
       case UnviableReason::Inaccessible:
         diags.diagnose(init->getLoc(), diag::type_eraser_init_not_accessible,
-                       init->getFormalAccess(), protocolType,
-                       protocol->getFormalAccess());
+                       init->getEffectiveAccess(), protocolType,
+                       protocol->getEffectiveAccess());
+        break;
+      case UnviableReason::SPI:
+        diags.diagnose(init->getLoc(), diag::type_eraser_init_spi,
+                       protocolType, protocol->isSPI());
         break;
       }
     }

test/attr/typeEraser.swift

@@ -124,3 +124,29 @@ class FailableInit: E2 {
 }
 @_typeEraser(FailableInit) // expected-error {{type eraser 'FailableInit' has no viable initializer of the form 'init<T: E2>(erasing: T)'}}
 protocol E2 {}
+
+// SPI type eraser and non-SPI protocol
+@_spi(SPI)
+public struct AnyE3_SPI: E3 {
+  public init<T: E3>(erasing: T) {} // expected-note {{'init(erasing:)' is SPI, but protocol 'E3' is not}}
+}
+@_typeEraser(AnyE3_SPI) // expected-error {{type eraser 'AnyE3_SPI' has no viable initializer of the form 'init<T: E3>(erasing: T)'}}
+public protocol E3 {}
+
+// SPI type eraser and SPI protocol of different groups
+@_spi(SPI2)
+public struct AnyE4_SPI: E4 {
+  public init<T: E4>(erasing: T) {} // expected-note {{'init(erasing:)' is SPI, but protocol 'E4' is not in the same SPI groups as 'init(erasing:)'}}
+}
+@_spi(SPI1) @_spi(SPI2)
+@_typeEraser(AnyE4_SPI) // expected-error {{type eraser 'AnyE4_SPI' has no viable initializer of the form 'init<T: E4>(erasing: T)'}}
+public protocol E4 {}
+
+// Same-group SPI type eraser and protocol
+@_spi(SPI1) @_spi(SPI2)
+public struct AnyE5_SPI: E5 {
+  public init<T: E5>(erasing: T) {}
+}
+@_spi(SPI2) @_spi(SPI1)
+@_typeEraser(AnyE5_SPI) // same SPI groups, okay
+public protocol E5 {}