I get a different response after deploying the contract and verifying than that shown in video..

[adityapadekar]

I know that as time passes things might change but I just want to know it what I am doing is correct or not..

The code snippet of the deploy.js is as follows

const { ethers, run, network } = require("hardhat")

const main = async () => {
	const SimpleStorageFactory = await ethers.getContractFactory(
		"SimpleStorage"
	)
	console.log("Deploying ...")
	const simpleStorage = await SimpleStorageFactory.deploy()
	await simpleStorage.deployed()

	console.log(`Deployed to ${simpleStorage.address}`)

	if (network.config.chainID === 11155111 && process.env.ETHERSCAN_API_KEY) {
		console.log("verify")
		await simpleStorage.deployTransaction.wait(6)
		await verify(simpleStorage.address, [])
	}


	const currentValue = await simpleStorage.retrieve()
	console.log(`Current value is ${currentValue}`)

	const transactionResponse = await simpleStorage.store(7)
	await transactionResponse.wait(1)
	const updatedValue = await simpleStorage.retrieve()
	console.log(`Updated value is ${updatedValue}`)
}

const verify = async (contractAddress, args) => {
	console.log("Verifying contract...")
	try {
		await run("verify:verify", {
			address: contractAddress,
			constructorArguments: args,
		})
	}
	catch (err) {
		console.log(err)
	}
}

main()
	.then(() => process.exit(0))
	.catch((err) => {
		console.log(err)
		process. Exit(1)
	})

the corresponding response I get is as follows

PS D:\STFU\VS Code\Blockchain\SimpleStorageHardHat> yarn hardhat run scripts/deploy.js --network sepoliacyarn run v1.22.19
$ "D:\STFU\VS Code\Blockchain\SimpleStorageHardHat\node_modules\.bin\hardhat" run scripts/deploy.js --network sepolia

Deploying ...
Deployed to 0x7758697b346FB66eF99d78bB46658970Ad0A0CF8
verify
Verifying contract...
The contract 0x7758697b346FB66eF99d78bB46658970Ad0A0CF8 has already been verified
Current value is 0
Updated value is 7
Done in 109.98s.

[Niferu]

Hello @adityapadekar

There is nothing wrong with your response. Console printed everything that you wanted, so I'm not sure where do you see any problem.