Skip to content

Conversation

@marchcat
Copy link
Contributor

@marchcat marchcat commented Nov 19, 2025

Add Linux build support to SLua PV.

maxim-productengine and others added 30 commits October 22, 2025 00:50
1. Dupplicate call in llselectmgr can cause race conditions
2. lltooldragndrop wasn't updating server in one case
Wrong approach. Might need to split workerDeployDevices into
separate recording and rendering variants.
This partiall reverts commit bb26aa3,
I left log lines.
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Fix various files missing linden_common

Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Restore changes for GLIB based dbus support from archive/develop

Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
Signed-off-by: Rye <rye@alchemyviewer.org>
@HaroldCindy
Copy link

Looks like websocketpp does not like compiling in C++20 mode on GCC zaphoyd/websocketpp#991

@HaroldCindy
Copy link

Confirmed on Linux with GCC that the branch should build okay when secondlife/3p-websocketpp#3 lands

@HaroldCindy
Copy link

Odd, seems like there's some issues with the build cache. There's intermittent windows errors with finding KDU and subsequent retries fail on hashing the autobuild.xml.

@HaroldCindy
Copy link

Should be okay, apparently AzureSignTool just updated, so that might be failing for other PRs as well.

FWIW multiple people have been using the linux build from this PR for a bit and things seem to be working fine

@marchcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you, @HaroldCindy!

Yeah, the build failure is unrelated to this PR. We'll likely fix it in develop.

@marchcat marchcat marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2025 09:00
@marchcat marchcat requested a review from Geenz November 24, 2025 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants