@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ async fn test_schema_await_with_unreachable_node() {
8080 let host_ids = calculate_proxy_host_ids ( & proxy_uris, & translation_map, & session) ;
8181
8282 {
83+ tracing:: info!( "Sub test 1" ) ;
84+
8385 // Case 1: Paused node is a coordinator for DDL.
8486 // DDL needs to fail.
8587 let result = run_some_ddl_with_unreachable_node (
@@ -100,6 +102,8 @@ async fn test_schema_await_with_unreachable_node() {
100102 }
101103
102104 {
105+ tracing:: info!( "Sub test 1" ) ;
106+
103107 // Case 2: Paused node is NOT a coordinator for DDL.
104108 // DDL should succeed, because auto schema agreement only needs available nodes to agree.
105109 let result = run_some_ddl_with_unreachable_node (
@@ -113,6 +117,8 @@ async fn test_schema_await_with_unreachable_node() {
113117 }
114118
115119 {
120+ tracing:: info!( "Sub test 1" ) ;
121+
116122 // Case 3: Paused node is a coordinator for DDL, and is used by control connection.
117123 // It is the same as case 1, but paused node is also control connection.
118124 // DDL needs to fail.
@@ -134,6 +140,8 @@ async fn test_schema_await_with_unreachable_node() {
134140 }
135141
136142 {
143+ tracing:: info!( "Sub test 1" ) ;
144+
137145 // Case 4: Paused node is NOT a coordinator for DDL, but is used by control connection.
138146 // It is the same as case 2, but paused node is also control connection.
139147 // DDL should succeed, because auto schema agreement only needs available nodes to agree,
0 commit comments