rename const_evaluatable_checked to generic_const_exprs

✨

Author: BoxyUwU

compiler/rustc_feature/src/active.rs

@@ -551,9 +551,6 @@ declare_features! (
     /// Allows `if let` guard in match arms.
     (active, if_let_guard, "1.47.0", Some(51114), None),
 
-    /// Allows non-trivial generic constants which have to be manually propagated upwards.
-    (incomplete, const_evaluatable_checked, "1.48.0", Some(76560), None),
-
     /// Allows basic arithmetic on floating point types in a `const fn`.
     (active, const_fn_floating_point_arithmetic, "1.48.0", Some(57241), None),
 
@@ -679,6 +676,9 @@ declare_features! (
     /// Allows using doc(primitive) without a future-incompat warning
     (active, doc_primitive, "1.56.0", Some(88070), None),
 
+    /// Allows non-trivial generic constants which have to have wfness manually propagated to callers
+    (incomplete, generic_const_exprs, "1.56.0", Some(76560), None),
+
     // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
     // feature-group-end: actual feature gates
     // -------------------------------------------------------------------------

compiler/rustc_feature/src/removed.rs

@@ -128,9 +128,13 @@ declare_features! (
      Some("Removed in favor of `~const` bound in #![feature(const_trait_impl)]")),
     /// Allows `#[no_debug]`.
     (removed, no_debug, "1.43.0", Some(29721), None, Some("removed due to lack of demand")),
+    /// Lazily evaluate constants. This allows constants to depend on type parameters.
+    (removed, lazy_normalization_consts, "1.46.0", Some(72219), None, Some("superseded by `generic_const_exprs`")),
     /// Allows comparing raw pointers during const eval.
     (removed, const_compare_raw_pointers, "1.46.0", Some(53020), None,
      Some("cannot be allowed in const eval in any meaningful way")),
+    /// Allows non-trivial generic constants which have to be manually propagated upwards.
+    (removed, const_evaluatable_checked, "1.48.0", Some(76560), None, Some("renamed to `generic_const_exprs`")),
     /// Allows using the `#[link_args]` attribute.
     (removed, link_args, "1.53.0", Some(29596), None,
      Some("removed in favor of using `-C link-arg=ARG` on command line, \

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/relate.rs

@@ -577,13 +577,13 @@ pub fn super_relate_consts<R: TypeRelation<'tcx>>(
         }
 
         (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(au), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(bu))
-            if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked =>
+            if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs =>
         {
             tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts((au.shrink(), bu.shrink()))
         }
 
         // While this is slightly incorrect, it shouldn't matter for `min_const_generics`
-        // and is the better alternative to waiting until `const_evaluatable_checked` can
+        // and is the better alternative to waiting until `generic_const_exprs` can
         // be stabilized.
         (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(au), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(bu))
             if au.def == bu.def && au.promoted == bu.promoted =>

compiler/rustc_privacy/src/lib.rs

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ where
             }
             ty::PredicateKind::RegionOutlives(..) => ControlFlow::CONTINUE,
             ty::PredicateKind::ConstEvaluatable(uv)
-                if self.def_id_visitor.tcx().features().const_evaluatable_checked =>
+                if self.def_id_visitor.tcx().features().generic_const_exprs =>
             {
                 let tcx = self.def_id_visitor.tcx();
                 if let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv) {
@@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ impl SearchInterfaceForPrivateItemsVisitor<'tcx> {
                         self.visit(self.tcx.type_of(param.def_id));
                     }
                 }
-                // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): May want to look inside const here
+                // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): May want to look inside const here
                 GenericParamDefKind::Const { .. } => {
                     self.visit(self.tcx.type_of(param.def_id));
                 }

compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs

@@ -506,8 +506,8 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
 
                 if self.session.is_nightly_build() {
                     err.help(
-                        "use `#![feature(const_generics)]` and `#![feature(const_evaluatable_checked)]` \
-                        to allow generic const expressions"
+                        "use `#![feature(const_generics)]` and `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]` \
+                        to allow generic const expressions",
                     );
                 }
 

compiler/rustc_resolve/src/lib.rs

@@ -2734,9 +2734,7 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
                         ConstantItemRibKind(trivial, _) => {
                             let features = self.session.features_untracked();
                             // HACK(min_const_generics): We currently only allow `N` or `{ N }`.
-                            if !(trivial
-                                || features.const_generics
-                                || features.lazy_normalization_consts)
+                            if !(trivial || features.const_generics || features.generic_const_exprs)
                             {
                                 // HACK(min_const_generics): If we encounter `Self` in an anonymous constant
                                 // we can't easily tell if it's generic at this stage, so we instead remember
@@ -2809,9 +2807,7 @@ impl<'a> Resolver<'a> {
                         ConstantItemRibKind(trivial, _) => {
                             let features = self.session.features_untracked();
                             // HACK(min_const_generics): We currently only allow `N` or `{ N }`.
-                            if !(trivial
-                                || features.const_generics
-                                || features.lazy_normalization_consts)
+                            if !(trivial || features.const_generics || features.generic_const_exprs)
                             {
                                 if record_used {
                                     self.report_error(

compiler/rustc_span/src/symbol.rs

@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ symbols! {
         generators,
         generic_arg_infer,
         generic_associated_types,
+        generic_const_exprs,
         generic_param_attrs,
         get_context,
         global_allocator,

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
     span: Span,
 ) -> Result<(), NotConstEvaluatable> {
     debug!("is_const_evaluatable({:?})", uv);
-    if infcx.tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
+    if infcx.tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
         let tcx = infcx.tcx;
         match AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
             // We are looking at a generic abstract constant.
@@ -537,9 +537,9 @@ pub(super) fn mir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     def: ty::WithOptConstParam<LocalDefId>,
 ) -> Result<Option<&'tcx [mir::abstract_const::Node<'tcx>]>, ErrorReported> {
-    if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
+    if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
         match tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
-            // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We currently only do this for anonymous constants,
+            // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We currently only do this for anonymous constants,
             // meaning that we do not look into associated constants. I(@lcnr) am not yet sure whether
             // we want to look into them or treat them as opaque projections.
             //
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
         Ok(false)
     })()
     .unwrap_or_else(|ErrorReported| true)
-    // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We should instead have this
+    // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We should instead have this
     // method return the resulting `ty::Const` and return `ConstKind::Error`
     // on `ErrorReported`.
 }
@@ -656,13 +656,13 @@ pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
                 // branch should only be taking when dealing with associated constants, at
                 // which point directly comparing them seems like the desired behavior.
                 //
-                // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): This isn't actually the case.
+                // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): This isn't actually the case.
                 // We also take this branch for concrete anonymous constants and
                 // expand generic anonymous constants with concrete substs.
                 (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(a_uv), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(b_uv)) => {
                     a_uv == b_uv
                 }
-                // FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We may want to either actually try
+                // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We may want to either actually try
                 // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
                 // this, for now we just return false here.
                 _ => false,

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs

@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxtExt<'tcx> for InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                 )
             }
             SelectionError::NotConstEvaluatable(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam) => {
-                if !self.tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
+                if !self.tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
                     let mut err = self.tcx.sess.struct_span_err(
                         span,
                         "constant expression depends on a generic parameter",
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxtExt<'tcx> for InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     // issue. However, this is currently not actually possible
                     // (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66962#issuecomment-575907083).
                     //
-                    // Note that with `feature(const_evaluatable_checked)` this case should not
+                    // Note that with `feature(generic_const_exprs)` this case should not
                     // be reachable.
                     err.note("this may fail depending on what value the parameter takes");
                     err.emit();

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/fulfill.rs

@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
                 ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(c1, c2) => {
                     debug!(?c1, ?c2, "equating consts");
                     let tcx = self.selcx.tcx();
-                    if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
+                    if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
                         // FIXME: we probably should only try to unify abstract constants
                         // if the constants depend on generic parameters.
                         //