@@ -712,16 +712,24 @@ pub fn non_durable_rename(src: &Path, dst: &Path) -> std::io::Result<()> {
712712 std:: fs:: rename ( src, dst)
713713}
714714
715- // Note: Also used by librustdoc, see PR #43348. Consider moving this struct elsewhere.
716- //
717- // FIXME: Currently the `everybody_loops` transformation is not applied to:
718- // * `const fn`, due to issue #43636 that `loop` is not supported for const evaluation. We are
719- // waiting for miri to fix that.
720- // * `impl Trait`, due to issue #43869 that functions returning impl Trait cannot be diverging.
721- // Solving this may require `!` to implement every trait, which relies on the an even more
722- // ambitious form of the closed RFC #1637. See also [#34511].
723- //
724- // [#34511]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34511#issuecomment-322340401
715+ /// Replaces function bodies with `loop {}` (an infinite loop). This gets rid of
716+ /// all semantic errors in the body while still satisfying the return type,
717+ /// except in certain cases, see below for more.
718+ ///
719+ /// This pass is known as `everybody_loops`. Very punny.
720+ ///
721+ /// As of March 2021, `everybody_loops` is only used for the
722+ /// `-Z unpretty=everybody_loops` debugging option.
723+ ///
724+ /// FIXME: Currently the `everybody_loops` transformation is not applied to:
725+ /// * `const fn`; support could be added, but hasn't. Originally `const fn`
726+ /// was skipped due to issue #43636 that `loop` was not supported for
727+ /// const evaluation.
728+ /// * `impl Trait`, due to issue #43869 that functions returning impl Trait cannot be diverging.
729+ /// Solving this may require `!` to implement every trait, which relies on the an even more
730+ /// ambitious form of the closed RFC #1637. See also [#34511].
731+ ///
732+ /// [#34511]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34511#issuecomment-322340401
725733pub struct ReplaceBodyWithLoop < ' a , ' b > {
726734 within_static_or_const : bool ,
727735 nested_blocks : Option < Vec < ast:: Block > > ,
0 commit comments