@@ -141,27 +141,25 @@ impl MultiItemModifier for DeriveProcMacro {
141141
142142 // FIXME(pr-time): Just using the crate hash to notice when the proc-macro code has
143143 // changed. How to *correctly* depend on exactly the macro definition?
144- // I.e., depending on the crate hash is just a HACK ( and leaves garbage in the
145- // incremental compilation dir) .
144+ // I.e., depending on the crate hash is just a HACK, and ideally the dependency would be
145+ // more narrow .
146146 let macro_def_id = invoc_expn_data. macro_def_id . unwrap ( ) ;
147147 let proc_macro_crate_hash = tcx. crate_hash ( macro_def_id. krate ) ;
148148
149149 assert_eq ! ( invoc_expn_data. call_site, span) ;
150150
151- let res = crate :: derive_macro_expansion:: enter_context ( ( ecx, self . client ) , move || {
152- let key = ( invoc_id, proc_macro_crate_hash, input) ;
153- // FIXME(pr-time): Is this the correct way to check for incremental compilation (as
154- // well)?
155- if tcx. sess . opts . incremental . is_some ( )
156- && tcx. sess . opts . unstable_opts . cache_proc_macros
157- {
158- tcx. derive_macro_expansion ( key) . cloned ( )
159- } else {
160- crate :: derive_macro_expansion:: provide_derive_macro_expansion ( tcx, key) . cloned ( )
161- }
162- } ) ;
151+ let key = ( invoc_id, proc_macro_crate_hash, input) ;
163152
164- res
153+ // FIXME(pr-time): Is this the correct way to check for incremental compilation (as
154+ // well)?
155+ if tcx. sess . opts . incremental . is_some ( ) && tcx. sess . opts . unstable_opts . cache_proc_macros
156+ {
157+ crate :: derive_macro_expansion:: enter_context ( ( ecx, self . client ) , move || {
158+ tcx. derive_macro_expansion ( key) . cloned ( )
159+ } )
160+ } else {
161+ crate :: derive_macro_expansion:: provide_derive_macro_expansion ( tcx, key) . cloned ( )
162+ }
165163 } ) ;
166164 let Ok ( output) = res else {
167165 // error will already have been emitted
0 commit comments