use integer assoc consts instead of methods

Author: RalfJung

src/librustc/mir/interpret/allocation.rs

@@ -818,9 +818,9 @@ impl UndefMask {
             // First set all bits except the first `bita`,
             // then unset the last `64 - bitb` bits.
             let range = if bitb == 0 {
-                u64::max_value() << bita
+                u64::MAX << bita
             } else {
-                (u64::max_value() << bita) & (u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb))
+                (u64::MAX << bita) & (u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb))
             };
             if new_state {
                 self.blocks[blocka] |= range;
@@ -832,21 +832,21 @@ impl UndefMask {
         // across block boundaries
         if new_state {
             // Set `bita..64` to `1`.
-            self.blocks[blocka] |= u64::max_value() << bita;
+            self.blocks[blocka] |= u64::MAX << bita;
             // Set `0..bitb` to `1`.
             if bitb != 0 {
-                self.blocks[blockb] |= u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb);
+                self.blocks[blockb] |= u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb);
             }
             // Fill in all the other blocks (much faster than one bit at a time).
             for block in (blocka + 1)..blockb {
-                self.blocks[block] = u64::max_value();
+                self.blocks[block] = u64::MAX;
             }
         } else {
             // Set `bita..64` to `0`.
-            self.blocks[blocka] &= !(u64::max_value() << bita);
+            self.blocks[blocka] &= !(u64::MAX << bita);
             // Set `0..bitb` to `0`.
             if bitb != 0 {
-                self.blocks[blockb] &= !(u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb));
+                self.blocks[blockb] &= !(u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb));
             }
             // Fill in all the other blocks (much faster than one bit at a time).
             for block in (blocka + 1)..blockb {

src/librustc/mir/interpret/pointer.rs

@@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ pub trait PointerArithmetic: layout::HasDataLayout {
     fn overflowing_signed_offset(&self, val: u64, i: i128) -> (u64, bool) {
         // FIXME: is it possible to over/underflow here?
         if i < 0 {
-            // Trickery to ensure that `i64::min_value()` works fine: compute `n = -i`.
+            // Trickery to ensure that `i64::MIN` works fine: compute `n = -i`.
             // This formula only works for true negative values; it overflows for zero!
-            let n = u64::max_value() - (i as u64) + 1;
+            let n = u64::MAX - (i as u64) + 1;
             let res = val.overflowing_sub(n);
             self.truncate_to_ptr(res)
         } else {

src/librustc_mir/interpret/intrinsics.rs

@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
                         if is_add {
                             // max unsigned
                             Scalar::from_uint(
-                                u128::max_value() >> (128 - num_bits),
+                                u128::MAX >> (128 - num_bits),
                                 Size::from_bits(num_bits),
                             )
                         } else {
@@ -381,11 +381,11 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
         dest: PlaceTy<'tcx, M::PointerTag>,
     ) -> InterpResult<'tcx> {
         // Performs an exact division, resulting in undefined behavior where
-        // `x % y != 0` or `y == 0` or `x == T::min_value() && y == -1`.
+        // `x % y != 0` or `y == 0` or `x == T::MIN && y == -1`.
         // First, check x % y != 0 (or if that computation overflows).
         let (res, overflow, _ty) = self.overflowing_binary_op(BinOp::Rem, a, b)?;
         if overflow || res.assert_bits(a.layout.size) != 0 {
-            // Then, check if `b` is -1, which is the "min_value / -1" case.
+            // Then, check if `b` is -1, which is the "MIN / -1" case.
             let minus1 = Scalar::from_int(-1, dest.layout.size);
             let b_scalar = b.to_scalar().unwrap();
             if b_scalar == minus1 {

src/librustc_mir/interpret/validity.rs

@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ impl<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> ValidityVisitor<'rt, 'mir, 'tcx, M
         let (lo, hi) = valid_range.clone().into_inner();
         // Determine the allowed range
         // `max_hi` is as big as the size fits
-        let max_hi = u128::max_value() >> (128 - op.layout.size.bits());
+        let max_hi = u128::MAX >> (128 - op.layout.size.bits());
         assert!(hi <= max_hi);
         // We could also write `(hi + 1) % (max_hi + 1) == lo` but `max_hi + 1` overflows for `u128`
         if (lo == 0 && hi == max_hi) || (hi + 1 == lo) {