Auto merge of #123814 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-lxn0t4t, r=matthiaskrgr

Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #123459 (Correctly handle inlining of doc hidden foreign items)
 - #123740 (Reduce Size of `ModifierInfo`)
 - #123770 (Correct broken link in core::pin doc)
 - #123777 (Deduplicate some function implementations between the parser and AST/HIR)
 - #123808 (codegen tests: Tolerate `nuw` `nsw` on `trunc`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Author: bors

compiler/rustc_ast/src/ast.rs

@@ -920,14 +920,8 @@ impl BinOpKind {
         matches!(self, BinOpKind::And | BinOpKind::Or)
     }
 
-    pub fn is_comparison(&self) -> bool {
-        use BinOpKind::*;
-        // Note for developers: please keep this match exhaustive;
-        // we want compilation to fail if another variant is added.
-        match *self {
-            Eq | Lt | Le | Ne | Gt | Ge => true,
-            And | Or | Add | Sub | Mul | Div | Rem | BitXor | BitAnd | BitOr | Shl | Shr => false,
-        }
+    pub fn is_comparison(self) -> bool {
+        crate::util::parser::AssocOp::from_ast_binop(self).is_comparison()
     }
 
     /// Returns `true` if the binary operator takes its arguments by value.

compiler/rustc_hir_pretty/src/lib.rs

@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> {
     }
 
     fn print_expr_binary(&mut self, op: hir::BinOp, lhs: &hir::Expr<'_>, rhs: &hir::Expr<'_>) {
-        let assoc_op = bin_op_to_assoc_op(op.node);
+        let assoc_op = AssocOp::from_ast_binop(op.node);
         let prec = assoc_op.precedence() as i8;
         let fixity = assoc_op.fixity();
 
@@ -2328,33 +2328,6 @@ fn stmt_ends_with_semi(stmt: &hir::StmtKind<'_>) -> bool {
     }
 }
 
-fn bin_op_to_assoc_op(op: hir::BinOpKind) -> AssocOp {
-    use crate::hir::BinOpKind::*;
-    match op {
-        Add => AssocOp::Add,
-        Sub => AssocOp::Subtract,
-        Mul => AssocOp::Multiply,
-        Div => AssocOp::Divide,
-        Rem => AssocOp::Modulus,
-
-        And => AssocOp::LAnd,
-        Or => AssocOp::LOr,
-
-        BitXor => AssocOp::BitXor,
-        BitAnd => AssocOp::BitAnd,
-        BitOr => AssocOp::BitOr,
-        Shl => AssocOp::ShiftLeft,
-        Shr => AssocOp::ShiftRight,
-
-        Eq => AssocOp::Equal,
-        Lt => AssocOp::Less,
-        Le => AssocOp::LessEqual,
-        Ne => AssocOp::NotEqual,
-        Ge => AssocOp::GreaterEqual,
-        Gt => AssocOp::Greater,
-    }
-}
-
 /// Expressions that syntactically contain an "exterior" struct literal, i.e., not surrounded by any
 /// parens or other delimiters, e.g., `X { y: 1 }`, `X { y: 1 }.method()`, `foo == X { y: 1 }` and
 /// `X { y: 1 } == foo` all do, but `(X { y: 1 }) == foo` does not.

compiler/rustc_target/src/asm/mod.rs

@@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ use std::str::FromStr;
 pub struct ModifierInfo {
     pub modifier: char,
     pub result: &'static str,
-    pub size: u64,
+    pub size: u16,
 }
 
-impl From<(char, &'static str, u64)> for ModifierInfo {
-    fn from((modifier, result, size): (char, &'static str, u64)) -> Self {
+impl From<(char, &'static str, u16)> for ModifierInfo {
+    fn from((modifier, result, size): (char, &'static str, u16)) -> Self {
         Self { modifier, result, size }
     }
 }

library/core/src/pin.rs

@@ -379,11 +379,11 @@
 //!
 //! Exposing access to the inner field which you want to remain pinned must then be carefully
 //! considered as well! Remember, exposing a method that gives access to a
-//! <code>[Pin]<[&mut] InnerT>></code> where `InnerT: [Unpin]` would allow safe code to trivially
-//! move the inner value out of that pinning pointer, which is precisely what you're seeking to
-//! prevent! Exposing a field of a pinned value through a pinning pointer is called "projecting"
-//! a pin, and the more general case of deciding in which cases a pin should be able to be
-//! projected or not is called "structural pinning." We will go into more detail about this
+//! <code>[Pin]<[&mut] InnerT>></code> where <code>InnerT: [Unpin]</code> would allow safe code to
+//! trivially move the inner value out of that pinning pointer, which is precisely what you're
+//! seeking to prevent! Exposing a field of a pinned value through a pinning pointer is called
+//! "projecting" a pin, and the more general case of deciding in which cases a pin should be able
+//! to be projected or not is called "structural pinning." We will go into more detail about this
 //! [below][structural-pinning].
 //!
 //! # Examples of address-sensitive types

src/librustdoc/clean/inline.rs

@@ -63,8 +63,6 @@ pub(crate) fn try_inline(
 
     let import_def_id = attrs.and_then(|(_, def_id)| def_id);
 
-    let (attrs, cfg) = merge_attrs(cx, load_attrs(cx, did), attrs);
-
     let kind = match res {
         Res::Def(DefKind::Trait, did) => {
             record_extern_fqn(cx, did, ItemType::Trait);
@@ -134,7 +132,11 @@ pub(crate) fn try_inline(
             cx.with_param_env(did, |cx| clean::ConstantItem(build_const(cx, did)))
         }
         Res::Def(DefKind::Macro(kind), did) => {
-            let mac = build_macro(cx, did, name, import_def_id, kind, attrs.is_doc_hidden());
+            let is_doc_hidden = cx.tcx.is_doc_hidden(did)
+                || attrs_without_docs
+                    .map(|(attrs, _)| attrs)
+                    .is_some_and(|attrs| utils::attrs_have_doc_flag(attrs.iter(), sym::hidden));
+            let mac = build_macro(cx, did, name, import_def_id, kind, is_doc_hidden);
 
             let type_kind = match kind {
                 MacroKind::Bang => ItemType::Macro,
@@ -148,8 +150,14 @@ pub(crate) fn try_inline(
     };
 
     cx.inlined.insert(did.into());
-    let mut item =
-        clean::Item::from_def_id_and_attrs_and_parts(did, Some(name), kind, Box::new(attrs), cfg);
+    let mut item = crate::clean::generate_item_with_correct_attrs(
+        cx,
+        kind,
+        did,
+        name,
+        import_def_id.and_then(|def_id| def_id.as_local()),
+        None,
+    );
     // The visibility needs to reflect the one from the reexport and not from the "source" DefId.
     item.inline_stmt_id = import_def_id;
     ret.push(item);
@@ -179,6 +187,7 @@ pub(crate) fn try_inline_glob(
                 .iter()
                 .filter(|child| !child.reexport_chain.is_empty())
                 .filter_map(|child| child.res.opt_def_id())
+                .filter(|def_id| !cx.tcx.is_doc_hidden(def_id))
                 .collect();
             let attrs = cx.tcx.hir().attrs(import.hir_id());
             let mut items = build_module_items(

src/librustdoc/clean/mod.rs

@@ -3007,22 +3007,22 @@ fn clean_use_statement_inner<'tcx>(
             // were specifically asked for it
             denied = true;
         }
-        if !denied {
-            if let Some(mut items) = inline::try_inline(
+        if !denied
+            && let Some(mut items) = inline::try_inline(
                 cx,
                 path.res,
                 name,
                 Some((attrs, Some(import_def_id))),
                 &mut Default::default(),
-            ) {
-                items.push(Item::from_def_id_and_parts(
-                    import_def_id,
-                    None,
-                    ImportItem(Import::new_simple(name, resolve_use_source(cx, path), false)),
-                    cx,
-                ));
-                return items;
-            }
+            )
+        {
+            items.push(Item::from_def_id_and_parts(
+                import_def_id,
+                None,
+                ImportItem(Import::new_simple(name, resolve_use_source(cx, path), false)),
+                cx,
+            ));
+            return items;
         }
         Import::new_simple(name, resolve_use_source(cx, path), true)
     };

src/librustdoc/clean/utils.rs

@@ -580,7 +580,14 @@ pub(crate) fn find_nearest_parent_module(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> Opti
 /// This function exists because it runs on `hir::Attributes` whereas the other is a
 /// `clean::Attributes` method.
 pub(crate) fn has_doc_flag(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, did: DefId, flag: Symbol) -> bool {
-    tcx.get_attrs(did, sym::doc)
+    attrs_have_doc_flag(tcx.get_attrs(did, sym::doc), flag)
+}
+
+pub(crate) fn attrs_have_doc_flag<'a>(
+    mut attrs: impl Iterator<Item = &'a ast::Attribute>,
+    flag: Symbol,
+) -> bool {
+    attrs
         .any(|attr| attr.meta_item_list().is_some_and(|l| rustc_attr::list_contains_name(&l, flag)))
 }
 

src/librustdoc/formats/cache.rs

@@ -203,10 +203,10 @@ impl Cache {
 impl<'a, 'tcx> DocFolder for CacheBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
     fn fold_item(&mut self, item: clean::Item) -> Option<clean::Item> {
         if item.item_id.is_local() {
-            let is_stripped = matches!(*item.kind, clean::ItemKind::StrippedItem(..));
             debug!(
-                "folding {} (stripped: {is_stripped:?}) \"{:?}\", id {:?}",
+                "folding {} (stripped: {:?}) \"{:?}\", id {:?}",
                 item.type_(),
+                item.is_stripped(),
                 item.name,
                 item.item_id
             );
@@ -246,13 +246,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> DocFolder for CacheBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
         // trait.
         if let clean::TraitItem(ref t) = *item.kind {
             self.cache.traits.entry(item.item_id.expect_def_id()).or_insert_with(|| (**t).clone());
-        }
-
-        // Collect all the implementors of traits.
-        if let clean::ImplItem(ref i) = *item.kind
+        } else if let clean::ImplItem(ref i) = *item.kind
             && let Some(trait_) = &i.trait_
             && !i.kind.is_blanket()
         {
+            // Collect all the implementors of traits.
             self.cache
                 .implementors
                 .entry(trait_.def_id())

tests/codegen/ascii-char.rs

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ pub fn unwrap_digit_from_remainder(v: u32) -> AsciiChar {
     // CHECK-NOT: panic
 
     // CHECK: %[[R:.+]] = urem i32 %v, 10
-    // CHECK-NEXT: %[[T:.+]] = trunc i32 %[[R]] to i8
+    // CHECK-NEXT: %[[T:.+]] = trunc{{( nuw)?( nsw)?}} i32 %[[R]] to i8
     // CHECK-NEXT: %[[D:.+]] = or{{( disjoint)?}} i8 %[[T]], 48
     // CHECK-NEXT: ret i8 %[[D]]
 

tests/codegen/unchecked_shifts.rs

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ pub unsafe fn unchecked_shl_unsigned_smaller(a: u16, b: u32) -> u16 {
 
     // CHECK-DAG: %[[INRANGE:.+]] = icmp ult i32 %b, 16
     // CHECK-DAG: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %[[INRANGE]])
-    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc i32 %b to i16
+    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc{{( nuw)?( nsw)?}} i32 %b to i16
     // CHECK-DAG: shl i16 %a, %[[TRUNC]]
     a.unchecked_shl(b)
 }
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ pub unsafe fn unchecked_shr_signed_smaller(a: i16, b: u32) -> i16 {
 
     // CHECK-DAG: %[[INRANGE:.+]] = icmp ult i32 %b, 16
     // CHECK-DAG: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %[[INRANGE]])
-    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc i32 %b to i16
+    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc{{( nuw)?( nsw)?}}  i32 %b to i16
     // CHECK-DAG: ashr i16 %a, %[[TRUNC]]
     a.unchecked_shr(b)
 }
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ pub unsafe fn unchecked_shl_u8_i128(a: u8, b: i128) -> u8 {
 
     // CHECK-DAG: %[[INRANGE:.+]] = icmp ult i128 %b, 8
     // CHECK-DAG: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %[[INRANGE]])
-    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc i128 %b to i8
+    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc{{( nuw)?( nsw)?}} i128 %b to i8
     // CHECK-DAG: shl i8 %a, %[[TRUNC]]
     std::intrinsics::unchecked_shl(a, b)
 }
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ pub unsafe fn unchecked_shr_i8_u128(a: i8, b: u128) -> i8 {
 
     // CHECK-DAG: %[[INRANGE:.+]] = icmp ult i128 %b, 8
     // CHECK-DAG: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %[[INRANGE]])
-    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc i128 %b to i8
+    // CHECK-DAG: %[[TRUNC:.+]] = trunc{{( nuw)?( nsw)?}} i128 %b to i8
     // CHECK-DAG: ashr i8 %a, %[[TRUNC]]
     std::intrinsics::unchecked_shr(a, b)
 }