Don't call ungate_last

Author: est31

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs

@@ -2606,7 +2606,10 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
     /// Parses an `if` expression (`if` token already eaten).
     fn parse_expr_if(&mut self) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
         let lo = self.prev_token.span;
-        let cond = self.parse_expr_cond(lo.edition())?;
+        // Scoping code checks the top level edition of the `if`; let's match it here.
+        // The `CondChecker` also checks the edition of the `let` itself, just to make sure.
+        let let_chains_policy = LetChainsPolicy::EditionDependent { current_edition: lo.edition() };
+        let cond = self.parse_expr_cond(let_chains_policy)?;
         self.parse_if_after_cond(lo, cond)
     }
 
@@ -2716,41 +2719,16 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
 
     /// Parses the condition of a `if` or `while` expression.
     ///
-    /// The specified `edition` should be that of the whole `if` or `while` construct: the same
-    /// span that we later decide the drop behaviour on (editions ..=2021 vs 2024..)
+    /// The specified `edition` in `let_chains_policy` should be that of the whole `if` construct,
+    /// i.e. the same span we use to later decide whether the drop behaviour should be that of
+    /// edition `..=2021` or that of `2024..`.
     // Public because it is used in rustfmt forks such as https://github.com/tucant/rustfmt/blob/30c83df9e1db10007bdd16dafce8a86b404329b2/src/parse/macros/html.rs#L57 for custom if expressions.
-    pub fn parse_expr_cond(&mut self, edition: Edition) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
+    pub fn parse_expr_cond(&mut self, let_chains_policy: LetChainsPolicy) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
         let attrs = self.parse_outer_attributes()?;
         let (mut cond, _) =
             self.parse_expr_res(Restrictions::NO_STRUCT_LITERAL | Restrictions::ALLOW_LET, attrs)?;
 
-        CondChecker::new(self).visit_expr(&mut cond);
-
-        if let ExprKind::Let(_, _, _, Recovered::No) = cond.kind {
-            // Remove the last feature gating of a `let` expression since it's stable.
-            self.psess.gated_spans.ungate_last(sym::let_chains, cond.span);
-        } else {
-            fn ungate_let_exprs(this: &mut Parser<'_>, expr: &Expr) {
-                if !expr.span.at_least_rust_2024() {
-                    return;
-                }
-                match &expr.kind {
-                    ExprKind::Binary(BinOp { node: BinOpKind::And, .. }, lhs, rhs) => {
-                        ungate_let_exprs(this, rhs);
-                        ungate_let_exprs(this, lhs);
-                    }
-                    ExprKind::Let(..) => {
-                        this.psess.gated_spans.ungate_last(sym::let_chains, expr.span)
-                    }
-                    _ => (),
-                }
-            }
-            if edition.at_least_rust_2024() {
-                // Scoping code checks the top level edition of the `if`: let's match it here.
-                // Also check all editions in between, just to make sure.
-                ungate_let_exprs(self, &cond);
-            }
-        }
+        CondChecker::new(self, let_chains_policy).visit_expr(&mut cond);
 
         Ok(cond)
     }
@@ -3045,7 +3023,8 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
 
     /// Parses a `while` or `while let` expression (`while` token already eaten).
     fn parse_expr_while(&mut self, opt_label: Option<Label>, lo: Span) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
-        let cond = self.parse_expr_cond(lo.edition()).map_err(|mut err| {
+        let policy = LetChainsPolicy::EditionDependent { current_edition: lo.edition() };
+        let cond = self.parse_expr_cond(policy).map_err(|mut err| {
             err.span_label(lo, "while parsing the condition of this `while` expression");
             err
         })?;
@@ -3429,7 +3408,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
     }
 
     fn parse_match_arm_guard(&mut self) -> PResult<'a, Option<P<Expr>>> {
-        // Used to check the `let_chains` and `if_let_guard` features mostly by scanning
+        // Used to check the `if_let_guard` feature mostly by scanning
         // `&&` tokens.
         fn has_let_expr(expr: &Expr) -> bool {
             match &expr.kind {
@@ -3450,23 +3429,9 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
         let if_span = self.prev_token.span;
         let mut cond = self.parse_match_guard_condition()?;
 
-        CondChecker::new(self).visit_expr(&mut cond);
+        CondChecker::new(self, LetChainsPolicy::AlwaysAllowed).visit_expr(&mut cond);
 
         if has_let_expr(&cond) {
-            // Let chains are allowed in match guards, but only there
-            fn ungate_let_exprs(this: &mut Parser<'_>, expr: &Expr) {
-                match &expr.kind {
-                    ExprKind::Binary(BinOp { node: BinOpKind::And, .. }, lhs, rhs) => {
-                        ungate_let_exprs(this, rhs);
-                        ungate_let_exprs(this, lhs);
-                    }
-                    ExprKind::Let(..) => {
-                        this.psess.gated_spans.ungate_last(sym::let_chains, expr.span)
-                    }
-                    _ => (),
-                }
-            }
-            ungate_let_exprs(self, &cond);
             let span = if_span.to(cond.span);
             self.psess.gated_spans.gate(sym::if_let_guard, span);
         }
@@ -3493,7 +3458,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
                     unreachable!()
                 };
                 self.psess.gated_spans.ungate_last(sym::guard_patterns, cond.span);
-                CondChecker::new(self).visit_expr(&mut cond);
+                CondChecker::new(self, LetChainsPolicy::AlwaysAllowed).visit_expr(&mut cond);
                 let right = self.prev_token.span;
                 self.dcx().emit_err(errors::ParenthesesInMatchPat {
                     span: vec![left, right],
@@ -4072,7 +4037,14 @@ pub(crate) enum ForbiddenLetReason {
     NotSupportedParentheses(#[primary_span] Span),
 }
 
-/// Visitor to check for invalid/unstable use of `ExprKind::Let` that can't
+/// Whether let chains are allowed on all editions, or it's edition dependent (allowed only on
+/// 2024 and later). In case of edition dependence, specify the currently present edition.
+pub enum LetChainsPolicy {
+    AlwaysAllowed,
+    EditionDependent { current_edition: Edition },
+}
+
+/// Visitor to check for invalid use of `ExprKind::Let` that can't
 /// easily be caught in parsing. For example:
 ///
 /// ```rust,ignore (example)
@@ -4083,19 +4055,29 @@ pub(crate) enum ForbiddenLetReason {
 /// ```
 struct CondChecker<'a> {
     parser: &'a Parser<'a>,
+    let_chains_policy: LetChainsPolicy,
+    depth: u32,
     forbid_let_reason: Option<ForbiddenLetReason>,
     missing_let: Option<errors::MaybeMissingLet>,
     comparison: Option<errors::MaybeComparison>,
 }
 
 impl<'a> CondChecker<'a> {
-    fn new(parser: &'a Parser<'a>) -> Self {
-        CondChecker { parser, forbid_let_reason: None, missing_let: None, comparison: None }
+    fn new(parser: &'a Parser<'a>, let_chains_policy: LetChainsPolicy) -> Self {
+        CondChecker {
+            parser,
+            forbid_let_reason: None,
+            missing_let: None,
+            comparison: None,
+            let_chains_policy,
+            depth: 0,
+        }
     }
 }
 
 impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
     fn visit_expr(&mut self, e: &mut P<Expr>) {
+        self.depth += 1;
         use ForbiddenLetReason::*;
 
         let span = e.span;
@@ -4110,8 +4092,16 @@ impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
                             comparison: self.comparison,
                         },
                     ));
-                } else {
-                    self.parser.psess.gated_spans.gate(sym::let_chains, span);
+                } else if self.depth > 1 {
+                    // Top level `let` is always allowed; only gate chains
+                    match self.let_chains_policy {
+                        LetChainsPolicy::AlwaysAllowed => (),
+                        LetChainsPolicy::EditionDependent { current_edition } => {
+                            if !current_edition.at_least_rust_2024() || !span.at_least_rust_2024() {
+                                self.parser.psess.gated_spans.gate(sym::let_chains, span);
+                            }
+                        }
+                    }
                 }
             }
             ExprKind::Binary(Spanned { node: BinOpKind::And, .. }, _, _) => {
@@ -4213,5 +4203,6 @@ impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
                 // These would forbid any let expressions they contain already.
             }
         }
+        self.depth -= 1;
     }
 }