@@ -16,19 +16,17 @@ use rustc_middle::hir::nested_filter;
1616use rustc_middle:: middle:: resolve_bound_vars:: ResolvedArg ;
1717use rustc_middle:: middle:: stability:: EvalResult ;
1818use rustc_middle:: span_bug;
19- use rustc_middle:: ty:: error:: TypeErrorToStringExt ;
20- use rustc_middle:: ty:: fold:: { BottomUpFolder , fold_regions} ;
19+ use rustc_middle:: ty:: fold:: fold_regions;
2120use rustc_middle:: ty:: layout:: { LayoutError , MAX_SIMD_LANES } ;
2221use rustc_middle:: ty:: util:: { Discr , InspectCoroutineFields , IntTypeExt } ;
2322use rustc_middle:: ty:: {
24- AdtDef , GenericArgKind , RegionKind , TypeSuperVisitable , TypeVisitable , TypeVisitableExt ,
23+ AdtDef , GenericArgKind , TypeSuperVisitable , TypeVisitable , TypeVisitableExt ,
2524} ;
2625use rustc_session:: lint:: builtin:: UNINHABITED_STATIC ;
2726use rustc_trait_selection:: error_reporting:: InferCtxtErrorExt ;
2827use rustc_trait_selection:: error_reporting:: traits:: on_unimplemented:: OnUnimplementedDirective ;
2928use rustc_trait_selection:: traits;
3029use rustc_trait_selection:: traits:: outlives_bounds:: InferCtxtExt as _;
31- use rustc_type_ir:: fold:: TypeFoldable ;
3230use tracing:: { debug, instrument} ;
3331use ty:: TypingMode ;
3432use { rustc_attr_parsing as attr, rustc_hir as hir} ;
@@ -320,14 +318,18 @@ fn check_opaque_meets_bounds<'tcx>(
320318 | hir:: OpaqueTyOrigin :: AsyncFn { parent, .. }
321319 | hir:: OpaqueTyOrigin :: TyAlias { parent, .. } => parent,
322320 } ;
321+
322+ let misc_cause = ObligationCause :: misc ( span, def_id) ;
323+
324+ // FIXME: We should reveal the TAITs that end up in where clauses here, otherwise we
325+ // will not be able to match param-env candidates in the old solver, since we don't
326+ // have eq-modulo-normalization. This is less of a problem than it seems, since this
327+ // only matters if we have TAITs in where where clauses, which isn't achievable with
328+ // RPIT anyways.
323329 let param_env = tcx. param_env ( defining_use_anchor) ;
324330
325- // FIXME(#132279): Once `PostBorrowckAnalysis` is supported in the old solver, this branch should be removed.
326- let infcx = tcx. infer_ctxt ( ) . build ( if tcx. next_trait_solver_globally ( ) {
327- TypingMode :: post_borrowck_analysis ( tcx, defining_use_anchor)
328- } else {
329- TypingMode :: analysis_in_body ( tcx, defining_use_anchor)
330- } ) ;
331+ let infcx =
332+ tcx. infer_ctxt ( ) . build ( TypingMode :: post_borrowck_analysis ( tcx, defining_use_anchor) ) ;
331333 let ocx = ObligationCtxt :: new_with_diagnostics ( & infcx) ;
332334
333335 let args = match origin {
@@ -341,8 +343,6 @@ fn check_opaque_meets_bounds<'tcx>(
341343 } ) ,
342344 } ;
343345
344- let opaque_ty = Ty :: new_opaque ( tcx, def_id. to_def_id ( ) , args) ;
345-
346346 // `ReErased` regions appear in the "parent_args" of closures/coroutines.
347347 // We're ignoring them here and replacing them with fresh region variables.
348348 // See tests in ui/type-alias-impl-trait/closure_{parent_args,wf_outlives}.rs.
@@ -355,19 +355,11 @@ fn check_opaque_meets_bounds<'tcx>(
355355 _ => re,
356356 } ) ;
357357
358- // HACK: We eagerly instantiate some bounds to report better errors for them...
359- // This isn't necessary for correctness, since we register these bounds when
360- // equating the opaque below, but we should clean this up in the new solver.
358+ // NOTE: We elaborate the explicit item bounds for better spans.
361359 for ( predicate, pred_span) in
362- tcx. explicit_item_bounds ( def_id) . iter_instantiated_copied ( tcx, args)
360+ traits :: elaborate ( tcx, tcx . explicit_item_bounds ( def_id) . iter_instantiated_copied ( tcx, args) )
363361 {
364- let predicate = predicate. fold_with ( & mut BottomUpFolder {
365- tcx,
366- ty_op : |ty| if ty == opaque_ty { hidden_ty } else { ty } ,
367- lt_op : |lt| lt,
368- ct_op : |ct| ct,
369- } ) ;
370-
362+ let predicate = ocx. normalize ( & misc_cause, param_env, predicate) ;
371363 ocx. register_obligation ( Obligation :: new (
372364 tcx,
373365 ObligationCause :: new (
@@ -379,25 +371,24 @@ fn check_opaque_meets_bounds<'tcx>(
379371 predicate,
380372 ) ) ;
381373 }
382-
383- let misc_cause = ObligationCause :: misc ( span, def_id) ;
384- // FIXME: We should just register the item bounds here, rather than equating.
385- // FIXME(const_trait_impl): When we do that, please make sure to also register
386- // the `~const` bounds.
387- match ocx. eq ( & misc_cause, param_env, opaque_ty, hidden_ty) {
388- Ok ( ( ) ) => { }
389- Err ( ty_err) => {
390- // Some types may be left "stranded" if they can't be reached
391- // from a lowered rustc_middle bound but they're mentioned in the HIR.
392- // This will happen, e.g., when a nested opaque is inside of a non-
393- // existent associated type, like `impl Trait<Missing = impl Trait>`.
394- // See <tests/ui/impl-trait/stranded-opaque.rs>.
395- let ty_err = ty_err. to_string ( tcx) ;
396- let guar = tcx. dcx ( ) . span_delayed_bug (
397- span,
398- format ! ( "could not unify `{hidden_ty}` with revealed type:\n {ty_err}" ) ,
374+ // And check the `~const` bounds for an RPIT.
375+ if tcx. is_conditionally_const ( def_id) {
376+ for ( predicate, pred_span) in tcx. const_conditions ( def_id) . instantiate ( tcx, args) {
377+ let predicate = ocx. normalize (
378+ & misc_cause,
379+ param_env,
380+ predicate. to_host_effect_clause ( tcx, ty:: BoundConstness :: Maybe ) ,
399381 ) ;
400- return Err ( guar) ;
382+ ocx. register_obligation ( Obligation :: new (
383+ tcx,
384+ ObligationCause :: new (
385+ span,
386+ def_id,
387+ ObligationCauseCode :: OpaqueTypeBound ( pred_span, definition_def_id) ,
388+ ) ,
389+ param_env,
390+ predicate,
391+ ) ) ;
401392 }
402393 }
403394
@@ -421,27 +412,7 @@ fn check_opaque_meets_bounds<'tcx>(
421412 let outlives_env = OutlivesEnvironment :: with_bounds ( param_env, implied_bounds) ;
422413 ocx. resolve_regions_and_report_errors ( defining_use_anchor, & outlives_env) ?;
423414
424- if infcx. next_trait_solver ( ) {
425- Ok ( ( ) )
426- } else if let hir:: OpaqueTyOrigin :: FnReturn { .. } | hir:: OpaqueTyOrigin :: AsyncFn { .. } =
427- origin
428- {
429- // HACK: this should also fall through to the hidden type check below, but the original
430- // implementation had a bug where equivalent lifetimes are not identical. This caused us
431- // to reject existing stable code that is otherwise completely fine. The real fix is to
432- // compare the hidden types via our type equivalence/relation infra instead of doing an
433- // identity check.
434- let _ = infcx. take_opaque_types ( ) ;
435- Ok ( ( ) )
436- } else {
437- // Check that any hidden types found during wf checking match the hidden types that `type_of` sees.
438- for ( mut key, mut ty) in infcx. take_opaque_types ( ) {
439- ty. ty = infcx. resolve_vars_if_possible ( ty. ty ) ;
440- key = infcx. resolve_vars_if_possible ( key) ;
441- sanity_check_found_hidden_type ( tcx, key, ty) ?;
442- }
443- Ok ( ( ) )
444- }
415+ Ok ( ( ) )
445416}
446417
447418fn best_definition_site_of_opaque < ' tcx > (
@@ -535,50 +506,6 @@ fn best_definition_site_of_opaque<'tcx>(
535506 }
536507}
537508
538- fn sanity_check_found_hidden_type < ' tcx > (
539- tcx : TyCtxt < ' tcx > ,
540- key : ty:: OpaqueTypeKey < ' tcx > ,
541- mut ty : ty:: OpaqueHiddenType < ' tcx > ,
542- ) -> Result < ( ) , ErrorGuaranteed > {
543- if ty. ty . is_ty_var ( ) {
544- // Nothing was actually constrained.
545- return Ok ( ( ) ) ;
546- }
547- if let ty:: Alias ( ty:: Opaque , alias) = ty. ty . kind ( ) {
548- if alias. def_id == key. def_id . to_def_id ( ) && alias. args == key. args {
549- // Nothing was actually constrained, this is an opaque usage that was
550- // only discovered to be opaque after inference vars resolved.
551- return Ok ( ( ) ) ;
552- }
553- }
554- let strip_vars = |ty : Ty < ' tcx > | {
555- ty. fold_with ( & mut BottomUpFolder {
556- tcx,
557- ty_op : |t| t,
558- ct_op : |c| c,
559- lt_op : |l| match l. kind ( ) {
560- RegionKind :: ReVar ( _) => tcx. lifetimes . re_erased ,
561- _ => l,
562- } ,
563- } )
564- } ;
565- // Closures frequently end up containing erased lifetimes in their final representation.
566- // These correspond to lifetime variables that never got resolved, so we patch this up here.
567- ty. ty = strip_vars ( ty. ty ) ;
568- // Get the hidden type.
569- let hidden_ty = tcx. type_of ( key. def_id ) . instantiate ( tcx, key. args ) ;
570- let hidden_ty = strip_vars ( hidden_ty) ;
571-
572- // If the hidden types differ, emit a type mismatch diagnostic.
573- if hidden_ty == ty. ty {
574- Ok ( ( ) )
575- } else {
576- let span = tcx. def_span ( key. def_id ) ;
577- let other = ty:: OpaqueHiddenType { ty : hidden_ty, span } ;
578- Err ( ty. build_mismatch_error ( & other, tcx) ?. emit ( ) )
579- }
580- }
581-
582509/// Check that the opaque's precise captures list is valid (if present).
583510/// We check this for regular `impl Trait`s and also RPITITs, even though the latter
584511/// are technically GATs.
@@ -1844,11 +1771,7 @@ pub(super) fn check_coroutine_obligations(
18441771
18451772 debug ! ( ?typeck_results. coroutine_stalled_predicates) ;
18461773
1847- let mode = if tcx. next_trait_solver_globally ( ) {
1848- TypingMode :: post_borrowck_analysis ( tcx, def_id)
1849- } else {
1850- TypingMode :: analysis_in_body ( tcx, def_id)
1851- } ;
1774+ let mode = TypingMode :: post_borrowck_analysis ( tcx, def_id) ;
18521775
18531776 let infcx = tcx
18541777 . infer_ctxt ( )
@@ -1868,15 +1791,5 @@ pub(super) fn check_coroutine_obligations(
18681791 return Err ( infcx. err_ctxt ( ) . report_fulfillment_errors ( errors) ) ;
18691792 }
18701793
1871- if !tcx. next_trait_solver_globally ( ) {
1872- // Check that any hidden types found when checking these stalled coroutine obligations
1873- // are valid.
1874- for ( key, ty) in infcx. take_opaque_types ( ) {
1875- let hidden_type = infcx. resolve_vars_if_possible ( ty) ;
1876- let key = infcx. resolve_vars_if_possible ( key) ;
1877- sanity_check_found_hidden_type ( tcx, key, hidden_type) ?;
1878- }
1879- }
1880-
18811794 Ok ( ( ) )
18821795}
0 commit comments