Auto merge of #13208 - alex-semenyuk:fix_doc_from_iter_instead_of_collect, r=llogiq

Add clarification for from_iter_instead_of_collect

Close #13147

As mentioned at #13147 we should prefer to use collect depends on situation so clarify this at documentation and provide examples this cases.

changelog: none

Author: bors

clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs

@@ -1892,7 +1892,9 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
     /// trait.
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
-    /// It is recommended style to use collect. See
+    /// If it's needed to create a collection from the contents of an iterator, the `Iterator::collect(_)`
+    /// method is preferred. However, when it's needed to specify the container type,
+    /// `Vec::from_iter(_)` can be more readable than using a turbofish (e.g. `_.collect::<Vec<_>>()`). See
     /// [FromIterator documentation](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/trait.FromIterator.html)
     ///
     /// ### Example
@@ -1911,6 +1913,14 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
     ///
     /// assert_eq!(v, vec![5, 5, 5, 5, 5]);
     /// ```
+    /// but prefer to use
+    /// ```no_run
+    /// let numbers: Vec<i32> = FromIterator::from_iter(1..=5);
+    /// ```
+    /// instead of
+    /// ```no_run
+    /// let numbers = (1..=5).collect::<Vec<_>>();
+    /// ```
     #[clippy::version = "1.49.0"]
     pub FROM_ITER_INSTEAD_OF_COLLECT,
     pedantic,