|
1 | 1 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
2 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17 |
| 2 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
3 | 3 | | |
4 | 4 | LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
5 | 5 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]` |
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | = note: `-D clippy::get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings` |
8 | 8 |
|
9 | 9 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
10 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17 |
| 10 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
11 | 11 | | |
12 | 12 | LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); |
13 | 13 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]` |
14 | 14 |
|
15 | 15 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
16 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17 |
| 16 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17 |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); |
19 | 19 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]` |
20 | 20 |
|
21 | 21 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
22 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17 |
| 22 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17 |
23 | 23 | | |
24 | 24 | LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); |
25 | 25 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]` |
26 | 26 |
|
27 | 27 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
28 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17 |
| 28 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46:17 |
29 | 29 | | |
30 | 30 | LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
31 | 31 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]` |
32 | 32 |
|
33 | 33 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
34 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46:17 |
| 34 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:17 |
35 | 35 | | |
36 | 36 | LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); |
37 | 37 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]` |
38 | 38 |
|
| 39 | +error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
| 40 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:21 |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | +LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); |
| 43 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]` |
| 44 | + |
39 | 45 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
40 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10 |
| 46 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:9 |
41 | 47 | | |
42 | 48 | LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
43 | | - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]` |
| 49 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]` |
44 | 50 |
|
45 | 51 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
46 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:10 |
| 52 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:56:9 |
47 | 53 | | |
48 | 54 | LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
49 | | - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]` |
| 55 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]` |
50 | 56 |
|
51 | 57 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
52 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10 |
| 58 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:57:9 |
53 | 59 | | |
54 | 60 | LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
55 | | - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]` |
| 61 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]` |
56 | 62 |
|
57 | 63 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
58 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10 |
| 64 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:58:9 |
59 | 65 | | |
60 | 66 | LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; |
61 | | - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]` |
| 67 | + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]` |
62 | 68 |
|
63 | 69 | error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
64 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17 |
| 70 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67:17 |
65 | 71 | | |
66 | 72 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
67 | 73 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` |
68 | 74 |
|
69 | 75 | error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise |
70 | | - --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17 |
| 76 | + --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:68:17 |
71 | 77 | | |
72 | 78 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); |
73 | 79 | | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` |
74 | 80 |
|
75 | | -error: aborting due to 12 previous errors |
| 81 | +error: aborting due to 13 previous errors |
76 | 82 |
|
0 commit comments