Auto merge of #13195 - GuillaumeGomez:fix-false-positive-13183, r=Manishearth

Fix false positive for `missing_backticks` in footnote references

Fixes #13183.

changelog: Fix false positive for `missing_backticks` in footnote references

Author: bors

clippy_lints/src/doc/mod.rs

@@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ fn check_doc<'a, Events: Iterator<Item = (pulldown_cmark::Event<'a>, Range<usize
                     );
                 }
             },
-            FootnoteReference(text) | Text(text) => {
+            Text(text) => {
                 paragraph_range.end = range.end;
                 let range_ = range.clone();
                 ticks_unbalanced |= text.contains('`')
@@ -812,7 +812,8 @@ fn check_doc<'a, Events: Iterator<Item = (pulldown_cmark::Event<'a>, Range<usize
                     }
                     text_to_check.push((text, range, code_level));
                 }
-            },
+            }
+            FootnoteReference(_) => {}
         }
     }
     headers

tests/ui/doc/footnote_issue_13183.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// This is a regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/13183>.
+// It should not warn on missing backticks on footnote references.
+
+#![warn(clippy::doc_markdown)]
+// Should not warn!
+//! Here's a footnote[^example_footnote_identifier]
+//!
+//! [^example_footnote_identifier]: This is merely an example.
+
+fn main() {}