Commit f093870
committed
Return
This is a bit unintuitive, but we don't have another choice given the
implementation of `Relation::from_antijoin` and the `transmute` in the
next commit, although we could probably assume that `Relation<Vec<T>>`
and `Relation<Vec<(T, ())>>` are layout compatible, it is not
guaranteed.
Perhaps these should be renamed to `old`/`new` to make things clearer?Relation tuples in JoinInput::recent instead of stable
1 parent dc5e0fe commit f093870
1 file changed
+9
-8
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
132 | 132 | | |
133 | 133 | | |
134 | 134 | | |
135 | | - | |
136 | | - | |
137 | | - | |
| 135 | + | |
| 136 | + | |
| 137 | + | |
138 | 138 | | |
139 | 139 | | |
140 | | - | |
141 | | - | |
142 | | - | |
| 140 | + | |
| 141 | + | |
| 142 | + | |
| 143 | + | |
143 | 144 | | |
144 | 145 | | |
145 | 146 | | |
| |||
167 | 168 | | |
168 | 169 | | |
169 | 170 | | |
170 | | - | |
| 171 | + | |
171 | 172 | | |
172 | 173 | | |
173 | 174 | | |
174 | | - | |
| 175 | + | |
175 | 176 | | |
176 | 177 | | |
0 commit comments